Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The ERA5 global reanalysis: Preliminary extension to 1950
2021387 citationsBill Bell, Hans Hersbach et al.Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Societyprofile →
The ERA5 global reanalysis from 1940 to 2022
202478 citationsCornel Soci, Hans Hersbach et al.Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Societyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Dinand Schepers
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Dinand Schepers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dinand Schepers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dinand Schepers more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dinand Schepers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dinand Schepers. The network helps show where Dinand Schepers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dinand Schepers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dinand Schepers.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dinand Schepers based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dinand Schepers. Dinand Schepers is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Soci, Cornel, Hans Hersbach, A. J. Simmons, et al.. (2024). The ERA5 global reanalysis from 1940 to 2022. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 150(764). 4014–4048.78 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Bell, Bill, Hans Hersbach, A. J. Simmons, et al.. (2021). The ERA5 global reanalysis: Preliminary extension to 1950. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 147(741). 4186–4227.387 indexed citations breakdown →
Muñoz-Sabater, Joaquı́n, Bill Bell, Iskander Benhadj, et al.. (2019). The Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) contribution to Earth Observation Activities. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 11631.1 indexed citations
6.
Hersbach, Hans, Bill Bell, Paul Berrisford, et al.. (2019). The ERA5 Global Atmospheric Reanalysis at ECMWF as a comprehensive dataset for climate data homogenization, climate variability, trends and extremes.. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 10826.15 indexed citations
7.
Nicolas, Julien P., Hans Hersbach, Bill Bell, et al.. (2019). The ERA5 Reanalysis: Toward 70 years of global high-resolution hourly data for weather and climate applications. 2019.1 indexed citations
Butz, A., Sandrine Guerlet, Otto Hasekamp, et al.. (2011). Toward accurate CO 2 and CH 4 observations from GOSAT. Research Online (University of Wollongong). 2011.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.