Діна Токарчук

439 citations
46 papers · 266 indexed · h-index 11

Діна Токарчук

33 papers receiving 221 citations

Peers

Діна Токарчук
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 144
  • Economics and Econometrics 145
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 30
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 42
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 12
Replace Natalia Pryshliak with:
Natalia Pryshliak Ukraine
Grygorii Kaletnіk Ukraine
Іnna Honcharuk Ukraine
Galyna Trypolska Ukraine
Mirna Ivonne Gaya Scandiffio Brazil
Mykola O. Kyzym Ukraine
Олена Павлова Ukraine
Kostiantyn Pavlov Ukraine
Mírian Rumenos Piedade Bacchi Brazil
Keith Collins United States
Діна Токарчук relative to Natalia Pryshliak Ukraine Natalia Pryshliak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Natalia Pryshliak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Діна Токарчук

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Діна Токарчук's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Діна Токарчук with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Діна Токарчук more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Діна Токарчук

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Діна Токарчук. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Діна Токарчук. The network helps show where Діна Токарчук may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Діна Токарчук, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Діна Токарчук Line = papers co-authored together Діна Токарчук links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20240
3 20240
4 20240
5 20245
6 20231
7 20232
8 20232
9 20232
10 202314
11 202313
12 20220
13 20222
14 20221
15 20215
16 202118
17 20211
18 20205
19 20208
20 20181

About Діна Токарчук

Діна Токарчук is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 46 papers that have together received 266 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agriculture Market Analysis Ukraine (33 papers), Economic and Business Development Strategies (30 papers), Global Economic and Social Development (10 papers), Business and Economic Development (10 papers), Economic Issues in Ukraine (6 papers), Labor Market and Education (4 papers), Sustainability and Innovation in Business (3 papers) and Land Use and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (144 citations), Economics and Econometrics (145 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (30 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (42 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (12 citations). Діна Токарчук has collaborated with scholars based in Ukraine and Nicaragua. Frequent co-authors include Natalia Pryshliak, Іnna Honcharuk and Grygorii Kaletnіk. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, Journal of Ecological Engineering, INMATEH Agricultural Engineering, Environmental & Socio-economic Studies and Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026