Dina Pines

50 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Dina Pines
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 1.3k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 956
  • Organic Chemistry 735
  • Biophysics 116
  • Spectroscopy 245
Replace S. Pommeret with:
S. Pommeret France
Philip J. Reid United States
Peter Thistlethwaite Australia
N. J. TURRO United States
Ying‐Zhong Ma United States
Seung Kyu Min South Korea
Jerzy Karolczak Poland
Anne Myers Kelley United States
Terry L. Gustafson United States
Yuxiang Bu China
Dina Pines relative to S. Pommeret France S. Pommeret's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
S. Pommeret · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dina Pines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dina Pines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina Pines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina Pines more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dina Pines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina Pines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina Pines. The network helps show where Dina Pines may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dina Pines, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dina Pines Line = papers co-authored together Dina Pines links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005468
2 2009257
3 2007190
4 2007188
5 200491
6 200484
7 199784
8 201676
9 201374
10 201469
11 200266
12 200764
13 199857
14 200253
15 201146
16 201642
17 201436
18 202235
19 200134
20 200931

About Dina Pines

Dina Pines is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Materials Chemistry, having authored 52 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (34 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (32 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (10 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (7 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (4 papers) and Radical Photochemical Reactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (1.3k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (956 citations), Organic Chemistry (735 citations), Biophysics (116 citations) and Spectroscopy (245 citations). Dina Pines has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ehud Pines, Erik T. J. Nibbering, Omar F. Mohammed, J. Dreyer, Mirabelle Prémont‐Schwarz, Dan Huppert, Katrin Adamczyk, Ben‐Zion Magnes, Philip M. Kiefer and James T. Hynes. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Israel Journal of Chemistry, Chemical Physics Letters and The Journal of Physical Chemistry A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact