Dina Boikov
- Infectious Diseases top 2%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Microbiology top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- José A. VázquezJack D. SobelVarsha MoudgalRobert A. AkinsMaria LynchJ. D. SobelRiina Rautemaa‐RichardsonJosé Antonio Vázquez
- Topics
- Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (13 papers)Reproductive tract infections research (6 papers)Nail Diseases and Treatments (4 papers)
- Journals
- Clinical Infectious DiseasesJournal of Clinical MicrobiologyThe Journal of Infectious Diseases
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dina Boikov
20 papers receiving 903 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Infectious Diseases 658
- Epidemiology 536
- Microbiology 214
- Molecular Biology 115
- Plant Science 88
Countries citing papers authored by Dina Boikov
This map shows the geographic impact of Dina Boikov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina Boikov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina Boikov more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dina Boikov
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina Boikov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina Boikov. The network helps show where Dina Boikov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dina Boikov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dina Boikov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dina Boikov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dina Boikov. Dina Boikov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 94 | |
| 7 | 68 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 204 | |
| 10 | 74 | |
| 11 | 61 | |
| 12 | In vitro susceptibilities of Candida and Aspergillus species to Melaleuca alternafolia (tea tree) oil. | 23 |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 68 | |
| 17 | 101 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | Invasive Candida guilliermondii infection: in vitro susceptibility studies and molecular analysis. | 24 |
About Dina Boikov
Dina Boikov is a scholar working on Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 950 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (13 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (6 papers) and Nail Diseases and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (658 citations), Microbiology (214 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (40 citations). Dina Boikov has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include José A. Vázquez, Jack D. Sobel, Varsha Moudgal, Robert A. Akins, Maria Lynch, J. D. Sobel, Riina Rautemaa‐Richardson, José Antonio Vázquez, Pallavi Bhargava and Shivani Singh. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Infectious Diseases, Journal of Clinical Microbiology and The Journal of Infectious Diseases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.