Dina A. Proestou
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 10%
- Co-authors
- Wesley C. WarrenMarta Gómez-ChiarriDiane NacciXiming GuoAndrew WhiteheadNoah M. ReidJohn K. ColbourneBryan W. Clark
- Topics
- Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (10 papers)Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers)Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (5 papers)
- Journals
- SciencePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesMolecular Ecology
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dina A. Proestou
23 papers receiving 745 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Global and Planetary Change 271
- Ecology 249
- Genetics 189
- Molecular Biology 162
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 128
Countries citing papers authored by Dina A. Proestou
This map shows the geographic impact of Dina A. Proestou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina A. Proestou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina A. Proestou more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dina A. Proestou
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina A. Proestou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina A. Proestou. The network helps show where Dina A. Proestou may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dina A. Proestou
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dina A. Proestou. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dina A. Proestou based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dina A. Proestou. Dina A. Proestou is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 304 | |
| 12 | 65 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 73 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 27 |
About Dina A. Proestou
Dina A. Proestou is a scholar working on Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change and Parasitology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 757 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (10 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers) and Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aquatic Science (127 citations), Global and Planetary Change (271 citations) and Ecology (249 citations). Dina A. Proestou has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wesley C. Warren, Marta Gómez-Chiarri, Diane Nacci, Ximing Guo, Andrew Whitehead, Noah M. Reid, John K. Colbourne, Bryan W. Clark, Sibel I. Karchner and Mark E. Hahn. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Molecular Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.