Dillan Cellier
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
-
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Papers in
-
- Neural dynamics and brain function 7
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 6
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces 5
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 3
- Co-authors
- Justin Riddle (4 shared papers)Mark D’Esposito (4 shared papers)Kai Hwang (6 shared papers)Sofia Dhanani (2 shared papers)Jason M. Scimeca (1 shared paper)Isaac T. Petersen (2 shared papers)James M. Shine (1 shared paper)Stephanie C. Leach (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Neuroscience (2 papers)Cerebral Cortex (1 paper)Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (1 paper)Current Biology (1 paper)PLoS Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Dillan Cellier
6 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Cognitive Neuroscience 342
- Neurology 32
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 42
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 38
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 21
Countries citing papers authored by Dillan Cellier
This map shows the geographic impact of Dillan Cellier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dillan Cellier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dillan Cellier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dillan Cellier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dillan Cellier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dillan Cellier. The network helps show where Dillan Cellier may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Dillan Cellier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 168 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 110 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 0 |
About Dillan Cellier
Dillan Cellier is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry, Surgery and Communication, having authored 7 papers that have together received 372 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (342 citations), Neurology (32 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (42 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (38 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (21 citations). Dillan Cellier has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Justin Riddle, Mark D’Esposito, Kai Hwang, Sofia Dhanani, Jason M. Scimeca, Isaac T. Petersen, James M. Shine and Stephanie C. Leach. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Cerebral Cortex, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Current Biology and PLoS Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.