Dietmar Wolfram

5.0k total citations · 2 hit papers
124 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

Dietmar Wolfram is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, Dietmar Wolfram has authored 124 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 69 papers in Information Systems, 34 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 32 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in Dietmar Wolfram's work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (32 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (28 papers) and Web Data Mining and Analysis (23 papers). Dietmar Wolfram is often cited by papers focused on scientometrics and bibliometrics research (32 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (28 papers) and Web Data Mining and Analysis (23 papers). Dietmar Wolfram collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Dietmar Wolfram's co-authors include Amanda Spink, Tefko Saračević, Ronald Rousseau, Ying Ding, Bernard J. Jansen, Kun Lü, Peiling Wang, Isola Ajiferuke, Siluo Yang and Yuehua Zhao and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Computer.

In The Last Decade

Dietmar Wolfram

116 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Hit Papers

Searching the web: The pu... 2001 2026 2009 2017 2001 2014 200 400 600

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Dietmar Wolfram 1.7k 838 401 347 325 124 3.5k
Gobinda Chowdhury 1.1k 0.6× 880 1.1× 256 0.6× 339 1.0× 230 0.7× 99 3.1k
Judit Bar‐Ilan 2.3k 1.3× 619 0.7× 1.7k 4.2× 765 2.2× 475 1.5× 166 5.5k
Félix de Moya Anegón 1.3k 0.7× 638 0.8× 2.3k 5.8× 386 1.1× 411 1.3× 270 5.7k
Dirk Van den Poel 1.3k 0.8× 1.4k 1.7× 65 0.2× 1.1k 3.1× 511 1.6× 138 6.6k
Hsinchun Chen 1.1k 0.6× 1.4k 1.7× 65 0.2× 982 2.8× 327 1.0× 159 4.7k
Erjia Yan 815 0.5× 654 0.8× 1.0k 2.6× 346 1.0× 263 0.8× 84 3.5k
Katherine W. McCain 1.0k 0.6× 513 0.6× 1.0k 2.5× 416 1.2× 328 1.0× 53 3.7k
Paolo Giudici 784 0.5× 1.5k 1.7× 92 0.2× 155 0.4× 78 0.2× 213 4.6k
Pearl Brereton 3.4k 2.0× 1.5k 1.8× 159 0.4× 608 1.8× 715 2.2× 107 6.4k
Saeed‐Ul Hassan 440 0.3× 917 1.1× 320 0.8× 219 0.6× 64 0.2× 114 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Dietmar Wolfram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dietmar Wolfram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dietmar Wolfram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dietmar Wolfram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dietmar Wolfram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dietmar Wolfram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dietmar Wolfram. The network helps show where Dietmar Wolfram may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dietmar Wolfram

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dietmar Wolfram. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dietmar Wolfram based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dietmar Wolfram. Dietmar Wolfram is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wang, Peiling, et al.. (2024). Endorsements of five reporting guidelines for biomedical research by journals of prominent publishers. PLoS ONE. 19(2). e0299806–e0299806. 1 indexed citations
2.
Grácio, María Cláudia Cabrini, et al.. (2023). Authorship order as an indicator of similarity between article discourse and author citation identity in informetrics. Scientometrics. 128(10). 5389–5410. 2 indexed citations
3.
Grácio, María Cláudia Cabrini, et al.. (2022). ¿Existe una justificación para el orden de los autores en la mención de autoría? Un estudio de caso de la investigación en informetría. Revista española de Documentación Científica. 45(3). e335–e335. 1 indexed citations
4.
Bornmann, Lutz, Raf Guns, Mike Thelwall, & Dietmar Wolfram. (2021). Which aspects of the Open Science agenda are most relevant to scientometric research and publishing? An opinion paper. Quantitative Science Studies. 2(2). 438–453. 6 indexed citations
5.
Wolfram, Dietmar, et al.. (2020). Open peer review: promoting transparency in open science. Scientometrics. 125(2). 1033–1051. 85 indexed citations
6.
Wolfram, Dietmar, et al.. (2019). Building Strong Library and Information Science Education: IFLA Working Group White Paper (Expert Review). Bibliotekovedenie [Russian Journal of Library Science]. 68(2). 205–210. 3 indexed citations
7.
Grácio, María Cláudia Cabrini, et al.. (2019). Produção científica Latino-Americana em estudos métricos da informação. Brazilian Journal of Information Science research trends. 13(4). 52–74.
8.
Wolfram, Dietmar, et al.. (2019). Research software citation in the Data Citation Index: Current practices and implications for research software sharing and reuse. Journal of Informetrics. 13(2). 574–582. 17 indexed citations
9.
Jin, Zhang, et al.. (2019). Public health and social media: A study of Zika virus‐related posts on Yahoo! Answers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 71(3). 282–299. 25 indexed citations
10.
Wolfram, Dietmar, et al.. (2019). Open Peer Review: The Current Landscape and Emerging Models.. ISSI. 387–398. 6 indexed citations
11.
Wolfram, Dietmar, et al.. (2018). Informal data citation for data sharing and reuse is more common than formal data citation in biomedical fields. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(11). 1346–1354. 34 indexed citations
12.
Yang, Siluo, Dietmar Wolfram, & Feifei Wang. (2017). The relationship between the author byline and contribution lists: a comparison of three general medical journals. Scientometrics. 110(3). 1273–1296. 26 indexed citations
13.
Wolfram, Dietmar & Yuehua Zhao. (2014). A comparison of journal similarity across six disciplines using citing discipline analysis. Journal of Informetrics. 8(4). 840–853. 6 indexed citations
14.
Ding, Ying, Ronald Rousseau, & Dietmar Wolfram. (2014). Measuring Scholarly Impact: Methods and Practice. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 284 indexed citations
15.
Wolfram, Dietmar. (2013). An Analysis of Canadian Contributions to the Information Science Research Literature 1989-2008. 5 indexed citations
16.
Wolfram, Dietmar & Iris Xie. (2009). A Longitudinal Study of Database Usage Within a General Audience Digital Library. Texas Digital Library (University of Texas). 10(4). 2. 4 indexed citations
17.
Wolfram, Dietmar & Jin Zhang. (2001). The Impact of Term Indexing Characteristics on a Document Space. 26(4). 21–35. 2 indexed citations
18.
Buchanan, Elizabeth, et al.. (2000). Web-based and Traditional Instruction: A Systematic Study of student and Instructor Perceptions from a Graduate MLIS Program. World Conference on WWW and Internet. 2000(1). 655–656. 3 indexed citations
19.
Wolfram, Dietmar. (1999). Term co-occurrence in Internet queries : An analysis of the Excite data base. 24. 12–33. 16 indexed citations
20.
Wolfram, Dietmar, et al.. (1994). Equalizing Access to Electronic Networked Resources: A Model for Rural Libraries in the United States. Library trends. 42(4). 661–675. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026