Dieter Freundlieb
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Philosophy top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Literature and Literary Theory
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
- Topics
- Critical Theory and Philosophy (4 papers)Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers)Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Dieter Freundlieb
22 papers receiving 50 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 34
- Philosophy 31
- Sociology and Political Science 27
- Literature and Literary Theory 24
- Language and Linguistics 23
Countries citing papers authored by Dieter Freundlieb
This map shows the geographic impact of Dieter Freundlieb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dieter Freundlieb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dieter Freundlieb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dieter Freundlieb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dieter Freundlieb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dieter Freundlieb. The network helps show where Dieter Freundlieb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dieter Freundlieb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dieter Freundlieb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dieter Freundlieb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dieter Freundlieb. Dieter Freundlieb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | What is Literary Semantics | 1 |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | Reason and its other : rationality in modern German philosophy and culture | 3 |
| 12 | Calculating the Incalculable: Governmental Reasoning and the Humanities | 2 |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | Zur Wissenschaftstheorie der Literaturwissenschaft | 4 |
| 20 | Zur Wissenschaftstheorie der Literaturwissenschaft : eine Kritik der transzendentalen Hermeneutik | 2 |
About Dieter Freundlieb
Dieter Freundlieb is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 29 papers that have together received 90 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Critical Theory and Philosophy (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers) and Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (31 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (34 citations) and Language and Linguistics (23 citations). Dieter Freundlieb has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Wayne Hudson, John Rundell, Barbara A. Misztal and Harald Fricke. Their work appears in journals such as Poetics, Poetics Today and European Journal of Sociology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.