Dieter Busenlechner
- Oral Surgery top 0.5%
- Urology top 1%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Orthodontics top 2%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Georg WatzekRobert HaasBernhard PommerRudolf FürhauserReinhard GruberGeorg Mailath‐PokornyWerner ZechnerGeorg Watzak
- Topics
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (29 papers)Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (19 papers)Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (12 papers)
- Cited by
- Oral SurgeryUrologyOrthodontics
- Journals
- BiomaterialsBoneMaterials
- Partner nations
- AustriaSwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Dieter Busenlechner
32 papers receiving 771 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Oral Surgery 683
- Urology 351
- Biomedical Engineering 211
- Orthodontics 206
- Surgery 172
Countries citing papers authored by Dieter Busenlechner
This map shows the geographic impact of Dieter Busenlechner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dieter Busenlechner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dieter Busenlechner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dieter Busenlechner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dieter Busenlechner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dieter Busenlechner. The network helps show where Dieter Busenlechner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dieter Busenlechner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dieter Busenlechner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dieter Busenlechner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dieter Busenlechner. Dieter Busenlechner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 56 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 78 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 50 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 53 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | Radiologic follow-up of peri-implant bone loss around machine-surfaced and rough-surfaced interforaminal implants in the mandible functionally loaded for 3 to 7 years. | 61 |
| 20 | 10 |
About Dieter Busenlechner
Dieter Busenlechner is a scholar working on Oral Surgery, Urology and Orthodontics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 825 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (29 papers), Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (19 papers) and Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oral Surgery (683 citations), Urology (351 citations) and Orthodontics (206 citations). Dieter Busenlechner has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Georg Watzek, Robert Haas, Bernhard Pommer, Rudolf Fürhauser, Reinhard Gruber, Georg Mailath‐Pokorny, Werner Zechner, Georg Watzak, Gabor Tepper and Christoph Vasak. Their work appears in journals such as Biomaterials, Bone and Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.