Diego Scarabelli
About
In The Last Decade
Diego Scarabelli
6 papers receiving 180 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 116
- Materials Chemistry 112
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 66
- Biomedical Engineering 40
- Condensed Matter Physics 26
Countries citing papers authored by Diego Scarabelli
This map shows the geographic impact of Diego Scarabelli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diego Scarabelli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diego Scarabelli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diego Scarabelli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diego Scarabelli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diego Scarabelli. The network helps show where Diego Scarabelli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diego Scarabelli
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diego Scarabelli. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diego Scarabelli based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diego Scarabelli. Diego Scarabelli is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 52 | |
| 3 | 52 | |
| 4 | 35 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 13 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.