Diane S. Sepich
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cell Biology top 0.5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Lilianna Solnica‐KrezelJacek TopczewskiLila Solnica‐KrezelDina C. MyersFlorence L. MarlowR T OgataAnand ChandrasekharJason R. Jessen
- Topics
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (18 papers)Congenital heart defects research (12 papers)Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (11 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryGenes & Development
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechiaGermany
In The Last Decade
Diane S. Sepich
39 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Molecular Biology 2.3k
- Cell Biology 1.3k
- Genetics 370
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 321
- Surgery 222
Countries citing papers authored by Diane S. Sepich
This map shows the geographic impact of Diane S. Sepich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane S. Sepich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane S. Sepich more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diane S. Sepich
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane S. Sepich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane S. Sepich. The network helps show where Diane S. Sepich may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diane S. Sepich
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diane S. Sepich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diane S. Sepich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diane S. Sepich. Diane S. Sepich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 47 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 142 | |
| 10 | 76 | |
| 11 | 81 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 281 | |
| 14 | 163 | |
| 15 | 135 | |
| 16 | 399 | |
| 17 | 368 | |
| 18 | 100 | |
| 19 | 51 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Diane S. Sepich
Diane S. Sepich is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 40 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (18 papers), Congenital heart defects research (12 papers) and Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cell Biology (1.3k citations), Molecular Biology (2.3k citations) and Immunology and Allergy (128 citations). Diane S. Sepich has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Lilianna Solnica‐Krezel, Jacek Topczewski, Lila Solnica‐Krezel, Dina C. Myers, Florence L. Marlow, R T Ogata, Anand Chandrasekhar, Jason R. Jessen, Stephanie Bingham and Angel Amores. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Genes & Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.