Diane R. Elam

3.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Diane R. Elam is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Diane R. Elam has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 5 papers in Plant Science and 4 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Diane R. Elam's work include Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers). Diane R. Elam is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers). Diane R. Elam collaborates with scholars based in United States. Diane R. Elam's co-authors include Norman C. Ellstrand, Leonard Nunney, Karen Goodell, Terrie Klinger, Yan B. Linhart, Caroline E. Ridley, John D. Nason, Loyal A. Mehrhoff and Deborah T. Crouse and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Conservation Biology and Ecological Applications.

In The Last Decade

Diane R. Elam

8 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Hit Papers

Population Genetic Consequences of Small Population Size:... 1993 2026 2004 2015 1993 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Diane R. Elam United States 8 1.5k 1.4k 1.2k 853 509 8 2.7k
M. D. Loveless United States 10 1.2k 0.8× 1.2k 0.8× 1.0k 0.9× 594 0.7× 393 0.8× 11 2.2k
Francis C. Yeh Canada 25 1.6k 1.1× 808 0.6× 1.4k 1.2× 704 0.8× 868 1.7× 94 3.1k
Jarosław Burczyk Poland 27 1.4k 0.9× 1.2k 0.8× 891 0.8× 928 1.1× 637 1.3× 80 2.6k
Birgit Ziegenhagen Germany 29 1.2k 0.8× 752 0.5× 997 0.8× 684 0.8× 637 1.3× 71 2.5k
Nobuhiro Tomaru Japan 27 1.2k 0.8× 998 0.7× 766 0.6× 652 0.8× 684 1.3× 99 2.1k
Stephen J. Tonsor United States 25 913 0.6× 1.1k 0.8× 951 0.8× 655 0.8× 485 1.0× 44 2.2k
Magnus Popp Norway 27 1.1k 0.8× 1.6k 1.1× 1.2k 1.1× 410 0.5× 947 1.9× 45 2.9k
Irène Till‐Bottraud France 27 617 0.4× 1.3k 0.9× 1.0k 0.9× 713 0.8× 600 1.2× 61 2.3k
Kristina A. Schierenbeck United States 17 812 0.5× 1.2k 0.8× 1.1k 0.9× 838 1.0× 362 0.7× 30 2.6k
R. Lumaret France 30 1.2k 0.8× 1.3k 0.9× 1.7k 1.4× 366 0.4× 799 1.6× 72 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Diane R. Elam

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane R. Elam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane R. Elam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane R. Elam more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane R. Elam

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane R. Elam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane R. Elam. The network helps show where Diane R. Elam may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diane R. Elam

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diane R. Elam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diane R. Elam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diane R. Elam. Diane R. Elam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Elam, Diane R., Caroline E. Ridley, Karen Goodell, & Norman C. Ellstrand. (2006). Population size and relatedness affect fitness of a self-incompatible invasive plant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104(2). 549–552. 87 indexed citations
2.
Crouse, Deborah T., et al.. (2002). ENDANGERED SPECIES RECOVERY AND THE SCB STUDY: A U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE PERSPECTIVE. Ecological Applications. 12(3). 719–723. 21 indexed citations
3.
Goodell, Karen, Diane R. Elam, John D. Nason, & Norman C. Ellstrand. (1997). Gene flow among small populations of a self‐incompatible plant: an interaction between demography and genetics. American Journal of Botany. 84(10). 1362–1371. 57 indexed citations
4.
Nunney, Leonard & Diane R. Elam. (1994). Estimating the Effective Population Size of Conserved Populations. Conservation Biology. 8(1). 175–184. 266 indexed citations
5.
Ellstrand, Norman C. & Diane R. Elam. (1993). Population Genetic Consequences of Small Population Size: Implications for Plant Conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 24(1). 217–242. 2128 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Klinger, Terrie, Diane R. Elam, & Norman C. Ellstrand. (1991). Radish as a Model System for the Study of Engineered Gene Escape Rates Via Crop‐Weed Mating. Conservation Biology. 5(4). 531–535. 86 indexed citations
7.
Elam, Diane R. & Yan B. Linhart. (1988). Pollination and Seed Production in Ipomopsis aggregata: Differences Among and Within Flower Color Morphs. American Journal of Botany. 75(9). 1262–1262. 15 indexed citations
8.
Elam, Diane R. & Yan B. Linhart. (1988). POLLINATION AND SEED PRODUCTION IN IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA: DIFFERENCES AMONG AND WITHIN FLOWER COLOR MORPHS. American Journal of Botany. 75(9). 1262–1274. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026