Diane K. King
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 1%
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Russell E. GlasgowLisa A. StryckerCandace C. NelsonDeborah J. ToobertPaul A. EstabrooksDiego OsunaH Garth McKayBridget Gaglio
- Topics
- Diabetes Management and Education (23 papers)Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (18 papers)Health Policy Implementation Science (15 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaDiabetes CareAmerican Journal of Public Health
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Diane K. King
80 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- General Health Professions 1.7k
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 1.1k
- Epidemiology 768
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 542
- Applied Psychology 475
Countries citing papers authored by Diane K. King
This map shows the geographic impact of Diane K. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane K. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane K. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diane K. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane K. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane K. King. The network helps show where Diane K. King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diane K. King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diane K. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diane K. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diane K. King. Diane K. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 77 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 66 | |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 73 | |
| 15 | 107 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 142 | |
| 18 | 135 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | The Diabetes Network Internet-Based Physical Activity Intervention: A Randomized Pilot Study | 8 |
About Diane K. King
Diane K. King is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Health Professions and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 86 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes Management and Education (23 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (18 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (475 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (1.1k citations) and General Health Professions (1.7k citations). Diane K. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Russell E. Glasgow, Lisa A. Strycker, Candace C. Nelson, Deborah J. Toobert, Paul A. Estabrooks, Diego Osuna, H Garth McKay, Bridget Gaglio, Elizabeth Eakin and John R. Seeley. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Diabetes Care and American Journal of Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.