Diane Escott
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions 4
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 3
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Mental Health Treatment and Access 2
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement 3
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration 2
-
- Pregnancy-related medical research 2
- Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum 2
-
- Diet and metabolism studies 2
- Co-authors
- Helen SpibyPauline SladeRobert FraserDavid RichardsKarina LovellLinda GaskSimon GilbodyPeter Bower
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Diane Escott
13 papers receiving 472 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 156
- Psychiatry and Mental health 105
- Social Psychology 133
- General Health Professions 153
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 173
Countries citing papers authored by Diane Escott
This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Escott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Escott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Escott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diane Escott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Escott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Escott. The network helps show where Diane Escott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diane Escott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 47 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 59 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 67 | |
| 7 | Patients' experiences of receiving collaborative care for the treatment of depression in the UK: a qualitative investigation. | 2008 | 23 |
| 8 | 2007 | 124 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 22 | |
| 10 | 2004 | 44 | |
| 11 | Selected coping strategies in labour: an investigation of women's experiences | 2003 | 3 |
| 12 | 2003 | 47 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 18 |
About Diane Escott
Diane Escott is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Applied Psychology and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (4 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (156 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (105 citations), Social Psychology (133 citations), General Health Professions (153 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (173 citations). Diane Escott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Helen Spiby, Pauline Slade, Robert Fraser, David Richards, Karina Lovell, Linda Gask, Simon Gilbody, Peter Bower, Annette Lankshear and Angela Simpson. Their work appears in journals such as Birth, Midwifery, Psychology and Health, Clinical Psychology Review and The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.