Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Management of Acne
2003593 citationsDiane Berson, William D. James et al.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Berson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Berson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Berson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Berson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Berson. The network helps show where Diane Berson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diane Berson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diane Berson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diane Berson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Diane Berson. Diane Berson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Farris, Patricia K., Joshua Zeichner, & Diane Berson. (2016). Efficacy and Tolerability of a Skin Brightening/Anti-Aging Cosmeceutical Containing Retinol 0.5%, Niacinamide, Hexylresorcinol, and Resveratrol.. PubMed. 15(7). 863–8.20 indexed citations
7.
Rosso, J.Q. Del, Diane Thiboutot, Richard L. Gallo, et al.. (2014). Consensus recommendations from the American Acne & Rosacea Society on the management of rosacea, part 5: a guide on the management of rosacea.. PubMed. 93(3). 134–8.35 indexed citations
8.
Rosso, J.Q. Del, Diane Thiboutot, Richard L. Gallo, et al.. (2014). Consensus recommendations from the American Acne & Rosacea Society on the management of rosacea, part 3: a status report on systemic therapies.. PubMed. 93(1). 18–28.38 indexed citations
9.
Rosso, J.Q. Del, Diane Thiboutot, Richard L. Gallo, et al.. (2013). Consensus recommendations from the American Acne & Rosacea Society on the management of rosacea, part 1: a status report on the disease state, general measures, and adjunctive skin care.. PubMed. 92(5). 234–40.58 indexed citations
10.
Rosso, J.Q. Del, Diane Thiboutot, Richard L. Gallo, et al.. (2013). Consensus recommendations from the American Acne & Rosacea Society on the management of rosacea, part 2: a status report on topical agents.. PubMed. 92(6). 277–84.42 indexed citations
Berson, Diane, et al.. (2010). Cosmeceuticals: Practical Applications. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 37(4). 547–569.6 indexed citations
Berson, Diane, et al.. (2009). Clinical role and application of superficial chemical peels in today's practice.. PubMed. 8(9). 803–11.32 indexed citations
James, William D., et al.. (2002). Once-daily tazarotene 0.1 % gel versus once-daily tretinoin 0.1 % microsponge gel for the treatment of facial acne vulgaris: a double-blind randomized trial.. PubMed. 69(2 Suppl). 12–9.41 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.