Dian-Dong Li
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Clinical Biochemistry top 5%
- Topics
- Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (6 papers)Biochemical effects in animals (6 papers)Antioxidants, Aging, Portulaca oleracea (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Dian-Dong Li
33 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Molecular Biology 507
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 312
- Physiology 252
- Pharmacology 142
- Clinical Biochemistry 101
Countries citing papers authored by Dian-Dong Li
This map shows the geographic impact of Dian-Dong Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dian-Dong Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dian-Dong Li more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dian-Dong Li
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dian-Dong Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dian-Dong Li. The network helps show where Dian-Dong Li may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dian-Dong Li
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dian-Dong Li. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dian-Dong Li based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dian-Dong Li. Dian-Dong Li is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 94 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 69 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | Effects of AGEs on oxidation stress and antioxidation abilities in cultured astrocytes. | 22 |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | [Experimental study on effect of the water extract of dogwood fruits on the liver and testis in rats model of kidney-yang deficiency]. | 2 |
| 17 | [Potentiation and mechanism of cisplatin-induced apoptosis by lidamycin in human hepatoma BEL-7402 cells]. | 4 |
| 18 | Effects of aging and advanced glycation on gene expression in cerebrum and spleen of mice. | 4 |
| 19 | 360 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About Dian-Dong Li
Dian-Dong Li is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Toxicology and Physiology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (6 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (6 papers) and Antioxidants, Aging, Portulaca oleracea (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (312 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (101 citations) and Aging (20 citations). Dian-Dong Li has collaborated with scholars based in China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Song Xu, Zhen Wang, Hongbin Deng, Genxiang Mao, Qiang Qiu, Zhen Wang, Jianming Jiang, Dapeng Cui, Qiyang He and Danqing Song. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Pharmacology, Experimental Cell Research and Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.