Diana Vito

627 total citations
7 papers, 478 citations indexed

About

Diana Vito is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Demography and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana Vito has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 478 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Demography and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Diana Vito's work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers) and Marriage and Sexual Relationships (2 papers). Diana Vito is often cited by papers focused on Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers) and Marriage and Sexual Relationships (2 papers). Diana Vito collaborates with scholars based in Canada. Diana Vito's co-authors include John Hunsley, Monique Lefèbvre, Marlene Best, Tim Aubry, Susan James, Gordon W. Josephson and Michael McCarrey and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Psychology, Journal of Family Psychology and Family Relations.

In The Last Decade

Diana Vito

7 papers receiving 450 citations

Peers

Diana Vito
Linda Charvoz Switzerland
Diana Vito
Citations per year, relative to Diana Vito Diana Vito (= 1×) peers Linda Charvoz

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Vito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Vito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Vito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Vito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Vito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Vito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Vito. The network helps show where Diana Vito may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Vito

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Vito. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Vito based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Vito. Diana Vito is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Hunsley, John, Marlene Best, Monique Lefèbvre, & Diana Vito. (2001). The Seven-Item Short Form of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Further Evidence for Construct Validity. American Journal of Family Therapy. 29(4). 325–335. 117 indexed citations
2.
Hunsley, John, Marlene Best, Monique Lefèbvre, & Diana Vito. (2001). The Seven-Item Short Form of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Further Evidence for Construct Validity. American Journal of Family Therapy. 29(4). 325–335. 131 indexed citations
3.
Aubry, Tim, John Hunsley, Gordon W. Josephson, & Diana Vito. (2000). Quid pro quo: Fee for services delivered in a psychology training clinic. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 56(1). 23–31. 13 indexed citations
4.
Hunsley, John, et al.. (1999). Comparing therapist and client perspectives on reasons for psychotherapy termination.. Psychotherapy. 36(4). 380–388. 87 indexed citations
6.
Hunsley, John, et al.. (1996). Are self-report measures of dyadic relationships influenced by impression management biases?. Journal of Family Psychology. 10(3). 322–330. 19 indexed citations
7.
Hunsley, John, et al.. (1995). Construct Validity of the Short Forms of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Family Relations. 44(3). 231–231. 108 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026