Diana Shapiro

1.5k total citations
14 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Diana Shapiro is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana Shapiro has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Clinical Psychology, 2 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in Diana Shapiro's work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (3 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers). Diana Shapiro is often cited by papers focused on Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (3 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (2 papers). Diana Shapiro collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Diana Shapiro's co-authors include David A. Shapiro, P. C. Wason, John A. Corbett and Robert F. Hobson and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and The British Journal of Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Diana Shapiro

14 papers receiving 895 citations

Peers

Diana Shapiro
Rita D. French United States
Wilma Bucci United States
George Saslow United States
J. P. Sutcliffe Australia
Sanford Golin United States
Richard M. Kurtz United States
Nancy S. Kim United States
Tom Kubiszyn United States
Edwin E. Wagner United States
Andrew Parker United Kingdom
Rita D. French United States
Diana Shapiro
Citations per year, relative to Diana Shapiro Diana Shapiro (= 1×) peers Rita D. French

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Shapiro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Shapiro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Shapiro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Shapiro. The network helps show where Diana Shapiro may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Shapiro

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Shapiro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Shapiro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Shapiro. Diana Shapiro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Shapiro, Diana, et al.. (1987). Change Processes in Psychotherapy. British Journal of Addiction. 82(4). 431–444. 4 indexed citations
2.
Shapiro, David A. & Diana Shapiro. (1983). Comparative therapy outcome research: Methodological implications of meta-analysis.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 51(1). 42–53. 75 indexed citations
3.
Shapiro, David A. & Diana Shapiro. (1983). Comparative therapy outcome research: Methodological implications of meta-analysis.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 51(1). 42–53. 53 indexed citations
4.
Shapiro, David A. & Diana Shapiro. (1982). Meta-analysis of Comparative Therapy Outcome Research: a Critical Appraisal. Behavioural Psychotherapy. 10(1). 4–25. 55 indexed citations
5.
Shapiro, David A. & Diana Shapiro. (1982). Meta-analysis of comparative therapy outcome studies: A replication and refinement.. Psychological Bulletin. 92(3). 581–604. 19 indexed citations
6.
Shapiro, David A. & Diana Shapiro. (1982). Meta-analysis of comparative therapy outcome studies: A replication and refinement.. Psychological Bulletin. 92(3). 581–604. 428 indexed citations
7.
Shapiro, David A. & Diana Shapiro. (1982). Meta-analysis of Comparative Therapy Outcome Studies: a Reply to Wilson. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 10(4). 307–310. 27 indexed citations
8.
Shapiro, Diana. (1976). The effects of therapeutic conditions: Positive results revisited. British Journal of Medical Psychology. 49(4). 315–323. 9 indexed citations
9.
Shapiro, Diana & Robert F. Hobson. (1972). Change in psychotherapy: a single case study. Psychological Medicine. 2(3). 312–317. 2 indexed citations
10.
Wason, P. C. & Diana Shapiro. (1971). Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 23(1). 63–71. 293 indexed citations
11.
Hobson, Robert F. & Diana Shapiro. (1970). The Personal Questionnaire as a Method of Assessing Change during Psychotherapy. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 117(541). 623–626. 2 indexed citations
12.
Shapiro, Diana. (1970). The Rating of Psychotherapeutic Empathy: A Preliminary Study. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 9(2). 148–151. 11 indexed citations
13.
Corbett, John A., et al.. (1969). Tics and Gilles de la Tourette's Syndrome: A Follow-up Study and Critical Review. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 115(528). 1229–1241. 78 indexed citations
14.
Shapiro, Diana. (1969). Empathy, Warmth and Genuineness in Psychotherapy. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 8(4). 350–361. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026