Diana L. Clarke

4.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Diana L. Clarke is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana L. Clarke has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 6 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and 4 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Diana L. Clarke's work include Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (5 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (4 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (4 papers). Diana L. Clarke is often cited by papers focused on Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (5 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (4 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (4 papers). Diana L. Clarke collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Diana L. Clarke's co-authors include Jonas Frisén, Mårten Risling, Urban Lendahl, Stefan Momma, Clas B. Johansson, Johan Holmberg, Daniel I. H. Linzer, Brian J. Arey, Geula Gibori and James Buckley and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Cell and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Diana L. Clarke

17 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Hit Papers

Identification of a Neural Stem Cell in the Adult Mammali... 1999 2026 2008 2017 1999 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Diana L. Clarke United States 13 1.1k 1.1k 845 397 231 17 2.5k
Randall D. McKinnon United States 20 970 0.9× 1.3k 1.2× 691 0.8× 212 0.5× 180 0.8× 36 2.2k
Lucien J. Houenou United States 25 953 0.8× 1.3k 1.2× 1.7k 2.0× 439 1.1× 177 0.8× 41 3.0k
Seiji Hitoshi Japan 28 1.1k 0.9× 2.0k 1.9× 1.0k 1.2× 218 0.5× 283 1.2× 61 3.4k
Jun Kohyama Japan 32 950 0.8× 1.8k 1.7× 787 0.9× 578 1.5× 354 1.5× 56 2.9k
Motoshi Nagao Japan 20 853 0.7× 1.3k 1.2× 584 0.7× 177 0.4× 123 0.5× 30 2.0k
Haeyoung Suh‐Kim South Korea 28 561 0.5× 1.1k 1.0× 607 0.7× 706 1.8× 261 1.1× 78 2.2k
Emma E. Frost United States 22 782 0.7× 658 0.6× 449 0.5× 181 0.5× 121 0.5× 41 1.8k
Tetsuji Mori Japan 26 1.3k 1.2× 1.6k 1.5× 1.1k 1.3× 190 0.5× 274 1.2× 66 3.2k
Giorgia Dina Italy 21 762 0.7× 1.1k 1.0× 1.2k 1.4× 459 1.2× 81 0.4× 32 2.5k
Ashwin Woodhoo Spain 20 824 0.7× 1.1k 1.0× 1.6k 1.9× 179 0.5× 95 0.4× 25 2.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Diana L. Clarke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana L. Clarke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana L. Clarke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana L. Clarke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana L. Clarke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana L. Clarke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana L. Clarke. The network helps show where Diana L. Clarke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana L. Clarke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana L. Clarke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana L. Clarke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana L. Clarke. Diana L. Clarke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Dogan, Yildirim, Cecilia Barese, Jeffrey W. Schindler, et al.. (2022). Screening chimeric GAA variants in preclinical study results in hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy candidate vectors for Pompe disease. Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development. 27. 464–487. 8 indexed citations
2.
Baghbaderani, Behnam Ahmadian, Xinghui Tian, Kevan Shah, et al.. (2016). A Newly Defined and Xeno-Free Culture Medium Supports Every-Other-Day Medium Replacement in the Generation and Long-Term Cultivation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. PLoS ONE. 11(9). e0161229–e0161229. 12 indexed citations
3.
Nie, Ying, Patrick Walsh, Diana L. Clarke, Jon A. Rowley, & Thomas Fellner. (2014). Scalable Passaging of Adherent Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. PLoS ONE. 9(1). e88012–e88012. 36 indexed citations
4.
Buckley, James, et al.. (2011). EP4 receptor as a new target for bronchodilator therapy. Thorax. 66(12). 1029–1035. 87 indexed citations
5.
Clarke, Diana L., Rachel L. Clifford, David Proud, et al.. (2010). TNF  and IFN  Synergistically Enhance Transcriptional Activation of CXCL10 in Human Airway Smooth Muscle Cells via STAT-1, NF- B, and the Transcriptional Coactivator CREB-binding Protein. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 285(38). 29101–29110. 108 indexed citations
6.
Chen, Zhiyong, Frank C. Tortella, Jitendra R. Dave, et al.. (2009). Human Amnion-Derived Multipotent Progenitor Cell Treatment Alleviates Traumatic Brain Injury-Induced Axonal Degeneration. Journal of Neurotrauma. 26(11). 1987–1997. 36 indexed citations
7.
D’Alessandro, Josephine, Kuang‐Hui Lu, Brenda P. Fung, Alan Colman, & Diana L. Clarke. (2007). Rapid And Efficient in Vitro Generation of Pancreatic Islet Progenitor Cells from Nonendocrine Epithelial Cells in The Adult Human Pancreas. Stem Cells and Development. 16(1). 75–90. 12 indexed citations
8.
Clarke, Diana L.. (2003). Neural stem cells. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 32(S1). S13–S17. 11 indexed citations
9.
Clarke, Diana L. & Jonas Frisén. (2001). Differentiation potential of adult stem cells. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 11(5). 575–580. 73 indexed citations
10.
Holmberg, Johan, Diana L. Clarke, & Jonas Frisén. (2000). Regulation of repulsion versus adhesion by different splice forms of an Eph receptor. Nature. 408(6809). 203–206. 287 indexed citations
11.
Johansson, Clas B., Stefan Momma, Diana L. Clarke, et al.. (1999). Identification of a Neural Stem Cell in the Adult Mammalian Central Nervous System. Cell. 96(1). 25–34. 1489 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Telleria, Carlos, T. G. Parmer, Liping Zhong, et al.. (1997). The Different Forms of the Prolactin Receptor in the Rat Corpus Luteum: Developmental Expression and Hormonal Regulation in Pregnancy1. Endocrinology. 138(11). 4812–4820. 74 indexed citations
13.
Gu, Yong, R. K. Srivastava, Diana L. Clarke, Daniel I. H. Linzer, & Geula Gibori. (1996). The decidual prolactin receptor and its regulation by decidua-derived factors.. Endocrinology. 137(11). 4878–4885. 38 indexed citations
14.
Clarke, Diana L., Brian J. Arey, & Daniel I. H. Linzer. (1993). Prolactin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the ovary during the rat estrous cycle.. Endocrinology. 133(6). 2594–2603. 55 indexed citations
15.
Clarke, Diana L.. (1993). Changes in prolactin receptor expression during pregnancy in the mouse ovary. Endocrinology. 133(1). 224–232. 32 indexed citations
16.
Clarke, Diana L.. (1993). Prolactin receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in the ovary during the rat estrous cycle. Endocrinology. 133(6). 2594–2603. 19 indexed citations
17.
Clarke, Diana L. & Daniel I. H. Linzer. (1993). Changes in prolactin receptor expression during pregnancy in the mouse ovary.. Endocrinology. 133(1). 224–232. 86 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026