Diana Brahams
- Surgery top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Topics
- Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (61 papers)Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (37 papers)Reproductive Health and Technologies (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Diana Brahams
239 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
- Surgery 403
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 383
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 365
- Epidemiology 304
- Molecular Biology 256
Countries citing papers authored by Diana Brahams
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Brahams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Brahams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Brahams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Brahams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Brahams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Brahams. The network helps show where Diana Brahams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Brahams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Brahams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Brahams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Brahams. Diana Brahams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | Euthanasia in The Netherlands. | 2 |
| 8 | The reluctant survivor. | 1 |
| 9 | Medicine and the Law: Death of a child from undiagnosed diabetes | 5 |
| 10 | Bailment and donation of parts of the human body. | 2 |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | Transplantation, the fetus and the law. | 1 |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | Mentally incapable adults: consent to treatment. | 94 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | Damages awarded for failed vasectomy. | 81 |
| 18 | Liability in negligence as between negligent doctor and dispensing chemist: need for insurance to be made compulsory? | 10 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | Clinical trials and the consent of the patient. | 2 |
About Diana Brahams
Diana Brahams is a scholar working on Pharmacy, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 309 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (61 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (37 papers) and Reproductive Health and Technologies (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (188 citations), Transplantation (78 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (138 citations). Diana Brahams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard Horton, Malcolm Weller, Harry Zeitlin, Michael Baum and Iain Chalmers. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Anaesthesia and Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.