Devon Brackbill
Impact in
-
- Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
- Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
Papers in
-
- Impact of Technology on Adolescents 3
- Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation 2
- Social and Cultural Dynamics 1
-
- Complex Network Analysis Techniques 2
- Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence 2
- Co-authors
- Damon Centola (6 shared papers)Joshua Becker (3 shared papers)Andrea Baronchelli (1 shared paper)Sijia Yang (3 shared papers)Jingwen Zhang (1 shared paper)Natalie Herbert (1 shared paper)Edward D. Mansfield (1 shared paper)Diana C. Mutz (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Political Science (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Science (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Data in Brief (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Devon Brackbill
7 papers receiving 733 citations
Devon Brackbill's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 190
- Applied Psychology 78
- Communication 71
- Sociology and Political Science 332
- General Decision Sciences 12
Countries citing papers authored by Devon Brackbill
This map shows the geographic impact of Devon Brackbill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Devon Brackbill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Devon Brackbill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Devon Brackbill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Devon Brackbill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Devon Brackbill. The network helps show where Devon Brackbill may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Devon Brackbill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention Hit paper breakdown → | 2018 | 344 |
| 2 | 2017 | 183 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 110 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 86 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 4 |
About Devon Brackbill
Devon Brackbill is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Health, Political Science and International Relations and Strategy and Management, having authored 7 papers that have together received 770 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (2 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (2 papers), Social Media in Health Education (2 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (1 paper), Business Strategy and Innovation (1 paper) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (190 citations), Applied Psychology (78 citations), Communication (71 citations), Sociology and Political Science (332 citations) and General Decision Sciences (12 citations). Devon Brackbill has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Damon Centola, Joshua Becker, Andrea Baronchelli, Sijia Yang, Jingwen Zhang, Jingwen Zhang, Natalie Herbert, Edward D. Mansfield and Diana C. Mutz. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Political Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Science, PLoS ONE and Data in Brief.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.