Desirée L. Narango

963 total citations
26 papers, 673 citations indexed

About

Desirée L. Narango is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Desirée L. Narango has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 673 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 11 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 9 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Desirée L. Narango's work include Plant and animal studies (13 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (5 papers). Desirée L. Narango is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (13 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (5 papers). Desirée L. Narango collaborates with scholars based in United States, Spain and Czechia. Desirée L. Narango's co-authors include Douglas W. Tallamy, Peter P. Marra, Amanda D. Rodewald, Kimberley J. Shropshire, Susannah B. Lerman, Kelli L. Larson, Sharon J. Hall, Peter M. Groffman, Megan M. Wheeler and Kristen C. Nelson and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Desirée L. Narango

26 papers receiving 659 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Desirée L. Narango United States 14 282 251 233 208 186 26 673
Luke J. Potgieter South Africa 14 218 0.8× 212 0.8× 295 1.3× 214 1.0× 132 0.7× 29 741
Magali Deschamps‐Cottin France 12 244 0.9× 125 0.5× 254 1.1× 190 0.9× 131 0.7× 21 541
María Silvina Fenoglio Argentina 14 366 1.3× 143 0.6× 207 0.9× 137 0.7× 161 0.9× 27 671
Alvin J. Helden United Kingdom 14 242 0.9× 207 0.8× 214 0.9× 132 0.6× 89 0.5× 28 548
Felipe Martello Brazil 13 229 0.8× 220 0.9× 287 1.2× 194 0.9× 88 0.5× 37 609
Jörgen Wissman Sweden 14 180 0.6× 106 0.4× 197 0.8× 125 0.6× 117 0.6× 23 448
Kevin Austin United Kingdom 3 160 0.6× 126 0.5× 177 0.8× 270 1.3× 251 1.3× 5 555
Ross Rowe Australia 6 117 0.4× 214 0.9× 156 0.7× 308 1.5× 254 1.4× 9 615
Ulrike M. Irlich South Africa 8 163 0.6× 235 0.9× 178 0.8× 116 0.6× 59 0.3× 12 498
Simon Chollet France 13 105 0.4× 239 1.0× 250 1.1× 196 0.9× 150 0.8× 24 552

Countries citing papers authored by Desirée L. Narango

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Desirée L. Narango's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Desirée L. Narango with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Desirée L. Narango more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Desirée L. Narango

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Desirée L. Narango. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Desirée L. Narango. The network helps show where Desirée L. Narango may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Desirée L. Narango

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Desirée L. Narango. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Desirée L. Narango based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Desirée L. Narango. Desirée L. Narango is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Narango, Desirée L., Douglas W. Tallamy, & Kimberley J. Shropshire. (2025). Tree composition mitigates the negative effects of urbanization on specialist and generalist forest moth communities. Ecological Solutions and Evidence. 6(2). 1 indexed citations
2.
Narango, Desirée L., et al.. (2025). Non‐native congeneric trees are poor‐quality host plants for a larval Lepidopteran. Ecosphere. 16(5). 1 indexed citations
3.
Groffman, Peter M., Meghan L. Avolio, Sharon J. Hall, et al.. (2024). How do urban trees vary across the US? It depends on where and how you look. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 22(7). 1 indexed citations
5.
Litvak, Elizaveta, Meghan L. Avolio, Jeannine Cavender‐Bares, et al.. (2023). Evapotranspiration of Residential Lawns Across the United States. Water Resources Research. 59(6). 7 indexed citations
6.
Groffman, Peter M., Meghan L. Avolio, Jeannine Cavender‐Bares, et al.. (2023). Woody Plant–Soil Relationships in Interstitial Spaces Have Implications for Future Forests Within and Beyond Urban Areas. Ecosystems. 27(2). 185–206. 1 indexed citations
7.
Lerman, Susannah B., Kelli L. Larson, Desirée L. Narango, Mark A. Goddard, & Peter P. Marra. (2023). Humanity for Habitat: Residential Yards as an Opportunity for Biodiversity Conservation. BioScience. 73(9). 671–689. 18 indexed citations
8.
Lerman, Susannah B., Desirée L. Narango, Meghan L. Avolio, et al.. (2021). Residential yard management and landscape cover affect urban bird community diversity across the continental USA. Ecological Applications. 31(8). e02455–e02455. 48 indexed citations
9.
Narango, Desirée L., Douglas W. Tallamy, & Kimberley J. Shropshire. (2020). Few keystone plant genera support the majority of Lepidoptera species. Nature Communications. 11(1). 5751–5751. 52 indexed citations
10.
Cubino, Josep Padullés, Jeannine Cavender‐Bares, Peter M. Groffman, et al.. (2020). Taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional composition and homogenization of residential yard vegetation with contrasting management. Landscape and Urban Planning. 202. 103877–103877. 30 indexed citations
11.
Larson, Kelli L., Susannah B. Lerman, Megan M. Wheeler, et al.. (2020). Who is abuzz about bees? Explaining residents’ attitudes in Phoenix, Arizona. Urban Ecosystems. 24(1). 35–48. 8 indexed citations
12.
Tallamy, Douglas W., et al.. (2020). Do non‐native plants contribute to insect declines?. Ecological Entomology. 46(4). 729–742. 65 indexed citations
13.
Lerman, Susannah B., et al.. (2020). Wildlife in the city: human drivers and human consequences.. CABI eBooks. 37–66. 2 indexed citations
14.
15.
Narango, Desirée L., Douglas W. Tallamy, & Peter P. Marra. (2018). Nonnative plants reduce population growth of an insectivorous bird. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115(45). 11549–11554. 125 indexed citations
16.
Tallamy, Douglas W., et al.. (2018). Do Cultivars of Native Plants Support Insect Herbivores?. HortTechnology. 28(5). 596–606. 16 indexed citations
17.
Hansen, Winslow D., Amanda E. Sorensen, Leonardo Calle, et al.. (2018). How do we ensure the future of our discipline is vibrant? Student reflections on careers and culture of ecology. Ecosphere. 9(2). 12 indexed citations
18.
Narango, Desirée L. & Amanda D. Rodewald. (2017). Signal information of bird song changes in human-dominated landscapes. Urban Ecosystems. 21(1). 41–50. 15 indexed citations
19.
Narango, Desirée L. & Amanda D. Rodewald. (2015). Urban-associated drivers of song variation along a rural–urban gradient. Behavioral Ecology. 27(2). 608–616. 29 indexed citations
20.
Newell, Felicity L., et al.. (2013). Occurrence of Polygyny and Double Brooding In the Eastern Wood-Pewee. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 125(2). 251–259. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026