Dennis Mead

20 total papers · 473 total citations
14 papers, 402 citations indexed

About

Dennis Mead is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, Dennis Mead has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 402 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 6 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in Dennis Mead's work include Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (3 papers). Dennis Mead is often cited by papers focused on Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (11 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (3 papers). Dennis Mead collaborates with scholars based in United States and Japan. Dennis Mead's co-authors include Alfred E. Asato, Robert S. H. Liu, Marlene Denny, A. E. ASATO, Gregory M. L. Patterson, Xiao Yuan Li, R. S. H. Liu, Tôru Yoshizawa, Yoshitaka Fukada and Toshiyuki Okano and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Biochemistry and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Dennis Mead

14 papers receiving 388 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Dennis Mead 196 167 133 93 69 14 402
R. S. H. Liu 137 0.7× 142 0.9× 161 1.2× 116 1.2× 31 0.4× 19 380
Aubrey Knowles 160 0.8× 230 1.4× 64 0.5× 42 0.5× 8 0.1× 19 445
Annika Friberg 79 0.4× 89 0.5× 200 1.5× 27 0.3× 30 0.4× 15 379
Trishool Namani 93 0.5× 201 1.2× 72 0.5× 44 0.5× 23 0.3× 8 349
Jinsei Miyazaki 66 0.3× 152 0.9× 105 0.8× 104 1.1× 10 0.1× 9 334
Gilles Rubinstenn 203 1.0× 301 1.8× 104 0.8× 66 0.7× 17 0.2× 16 427
Anthony P. Guzikowski 81 0.4× 143 0.9× 148 1.1× 79 0.8× 20 0.3× 15 367
Rika Kawai‐Hirai 73 0.4× 155 0.9× 146 1.1× 67 0.7× 12 0.2× 19 430
Zi S. D. Toa 50 0.3× 164 1.0× 112 0.8× 51 0.5× 20 0.3× 16 446
Geoffrey R. Penzer 29 0.1× 210 1.3× 62 0.5× 101 1.1× 10 0.1× 16 397

Countries citing papers authored by Dennis Mead

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis Mead's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis Mead with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis Mead more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dennis Mead

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis Mead. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis Mead. The network helps show where Dennis Mead may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dennis Mead

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dennis Mead. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dennis Mead based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dennis Mead. Dennis Mead is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026