Dennis Mathew
Impact in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Aging top 5%
Papers in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 17
-
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction 7
- Plant and animal studies 5
- Co-authors
- Vivian BudnikJohn R. CarlsonShruthy KuttappanManitha B. NairScott A. KreherJunhyong KimMary PackardBulent Ataman
- Journals
- Scientific Reports (4 papers)Journal of Neuroscience (2 papers)Journal of Visualized Experiments (2 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Nature Methods (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaGermany
In The Last Decade
Dennis Mathew
29 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 705
- Aging 49
- Sensory Systems 128
- Insect Science 208
- Cell Biology 230
Countries citing papers authored by Dennis Mathew
This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis Mathew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis Mathew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis Mathew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dennis Mathew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis Mathew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis Mathew. The network helps show where Dennis Mathew may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dennis Mathew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 90 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 159 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 120 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 205 | |
| 19 | 2003 | 88 | |
| 20 | 2002 | 108 |
About Dennis Mathew
Dennis Mathew is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Sensory Systems, Aging and Genetics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (17 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (12 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (7 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (4 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (3 papers), Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (2 papers) and Insect Pheromone Research and Control (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (705 citations), Aging (49 citations), Sensory Systems (128 citations), Insect Science (208 citations) and Cell Biology (230 citations). Dennis Mathew has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Vivian Budnik, John R. Carlson, Shruthy Kuttappan, Manitha B. Nair, Scott A. Kreher, Junhyong Kim, Mary Packard, Bulent Ataman, Aravinthan D. T. Samuel and Marc Gershow. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Visualized Experiments, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nature Methods.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.