Dennis Janssen

2.6k total citations
127 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Dennis Janssen is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics of Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, Dennis Janssen has authored 127 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 119 papers in Surgery, 30 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 16 papers in Mechanics of Materials. Recurrent topics in Dennis Janssen's work include Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (89 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (81 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (55 papers). Dennis Janssen is often cited by papers focused on Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (89 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (81 papers) and Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (55 papers). Dennis Janssen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Dennis Janssen's co-authors include Nico Verdonschot, Kenneth A. Mann, Adam Briscoe, Pieter Buma, L. de Ruiter, Jan Stolk, Hamid Naghibi Beidokhti, Hubertus F.J.M. Koopman, A.H. van den Boogaard and Maarten de Waal Malefijt and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and The American Journal of Sports Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Dennis Janssen

118 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dennis Janssen Netherlands 26 1.7k 554 156 146 144 127 2.0k
A W Miles United Kingdom 27 1.7k 1.0× 489 0.9× 135 0.9× 101 0.7× 258 1.8× 136 2.3k
W J Maloney United States 19 2.3k 1.3× 371 0.7× 181 1.2× 61 0.4× 102 0.7× 28 2.5k
L. Munuera Spain 21 1.0k 0.6× 467 0.8× 154 1.0× 104 0.7× 104 0.7× 42 1.8k
Jonathan R.T. Jeffers United Kingdom 26 1.1k 0.7× 594 1.1× 548 3.5× 102 0.7× 170 1.2× 80 2.0k
Charles R. Bragdon United States 42 5.1k 3.0× 556 1.0× 390 2.5× 148 1.0× 144 1.0× 122 5.4k
Jorma Ryhänen Finland 21 715 0.4× 560 1.0× 141 0.9× 94 0.6× 142 1.0× 71 1.5k
Kengo Yamamoto Japan 29 2.2k 1.3× 344 0.6× 283 1.8× 133 0.9× 125 0.9× 192 2.9k
B. Gasser Switzerland 16 927 0.5× 590 1.1× 80 0.5× 73 0.5× 107 0.7× 29 1.4k
Georg Deuretzbacher Germany 14 2.2k 1.3× 388 0.7× 158 1.0× 61 0.4× 332 2.3× 22 2.6k
Heidi‐Lynn Ploeg United States 21 592 0.3× 491 0.9× 52 0.3× 52 0.4× 268 1.9× 80 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Dennis Janssen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis Janssen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis Janssen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis Janssen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dennis Janssen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis Janssen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis Janssen. The network helps show where Dennis Janssen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dennis Janssen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dennis Janssen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dennis Janssen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dennis Janssen. Dennis Janssen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Briscoe, Adam, et al.. (2023). The Sensitivity of the Micromotions of a Cementless PEEK Tibial Component to the Interface Characteristics. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
3.
Janssen, Dennis, et al.. (2022). The accuracy of navigated versus freehand curettage in bone tumors: a cadaveric model study. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 18(4). 775–783. 2 indexed citations
4.
Verdonschot, Nico, et al.. (2020). Population-based effect of total knee arthroplasty alignment on simulated tibial bone remodeling. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 111. 104014–104014. 8 indexed citations
5.
6.
Geest, Ingrid C.M. van der, et al.. (2019). Feasibility study of intraoperative cone‐beam CT navigation for benign bone tumour surgery. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 15(3). e1993–e1993. 8 indexed citations
7.
Verdonschot, Nico, et al.. (2017). A modelling approach demonstrating micromechanical changes in the tibial cemented interface due to in vivo service. Journal of Biomechanics. 56. 19–25. 3 indexed citations
8.
Janssen, Dennis, et al.. (2017). Experimental and computational analysis of micromotions of an uncemented femoral knee implant using elastic and plastic bone material models. Journal of Biomechanics. 61. 137–143. 28 indexed citations
9.
Miller, Mark A., et al.. (2016). Experimental and computational micromechanics at the tibial cement-trabeculae interface. Journal of Biomechanics. 49(9). 1641–1648. 12 indexed citations
10.
Janssen, Dennis, et al.. (2016). THE EFFECT OF ASSEMBLY FORCE AND ANGLE ON CONTACT PRESSURES AND MICROMOTIONS AT THE TAPER JUNCTION OF MODULAR HIP IMPLANTS. University of Twente Research Information. 48–48. 1 indexed citations
11.
Carbone, Vincenzo, René Fluit, Marjolein M. van der Krogt, et al.. (2015). TLEM 2.0 – A comprehensive musculoskeletal geometry dataset for subject-specific modeling of lower extremity. Journal of Biomechanics. 48(5). 734–741. 141 indexed citations
12.
Vrancken, A.C.T., et al.. (2015). The sensitivity of cartilage contact pressures in the knee joint to the size and shape of an anatomically shaped meniscal implant. Journal of Biomechanics. 48(8). 1427–1435. 25 indexed citations
13.
Janssen, Dennis, et al.. (2012). The assessment of the risk of fracture in femora with metastatic lesions Comparing case-specific finite element analyses with predictions by clinical experts. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 6 indexed citations
14.
Mann, Kenneth A., et al.. (2012). A new approach to quantify trabecular resorption adjacent to cemented knee arthroplasty. Journal of Biomechanics. 45(4). 711–715. 24 indexed citations
15.
Janssen, Dennis, et al.. (2012). On stabilization of loosened hip stems via cement injection into osteolytic cavities. Clinical Biomechanics. 27(8). 807–812. 9 indexed citations
16.
Janssen, Dennis, et al.. (2012). Interface micromechanics of transverse sections from retrieved cemented hip reconstructions: an experimental and finite element comparison. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine. 23(8). 2023–2035. 2 indexed citations
17.
Janssen, Dennis, et al.. (2010). The effect of cement creep and cement fatigue damage on the micromechanics of the cement–bone interface. Journal of Biomechanics. 43(15). 3028–3034. 13 indexed citations
18.
Janssen, Dennis, et al.. (2009). Finite element analysis of the effect of cementing concepts on implant stability and cement fatigue failure. Acta Orthopaedica. 80(3). 319–324. 27 indexed citations
19.
Janssen, Dennis, et al.. (2009). The mechanical effects of different levels of cement penetration at the cement–bone interface. Journal of Biomechanics. 43(6). 1167–1175. 55 indexed citations
20.
Janssen, Dennis, René Aquarius, Jan Stolk, & Nico Verdonschot. (2005). The contradictory effects of pores on fatigue cracking of bone cement. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials. 74B(2). 747–753. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A W Miles Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by W J Maloney Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by L. Munuera Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jonathan R.T. Jeffers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Charles R. Bragdon Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jorma Ryhänen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kengo Yamamoto Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B. Gasser Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Georg Deuretzbacher Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Heidi‐Lynn Ploeg
Rankless by CCL
2026