Dennis Benker

971 total citations
10 papers, 54 citations indexed

About

Dennis Benker is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. According to data from OpenAlex, Dennis Benker has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 54 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Materials Chemistry, 5 papers in Inorganic Chemistry and 4 papers in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. Recurrent topics in Dennis Benker's work include Nuclear Materials and Properties (6 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (5 papers) and Nuclear and radioactivity studies (4 papers). Dennis Benker is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear Materials and Properties (6 papers), Radioactive element chemistry and processing (5 papers) and Nuclear and radioactivity studies (4 papers). Dennis Benker collaborates with scholars based in United States. Dennis Benker's co-authors include E.D. Collins, S.M. Robinson, Julie Ezold, L. K. Felker, Barry B. Spencer, David Chandler, C.W. Alexander, Joanna McFarlane, G. D. Del Cul and David W. DePaoli and has published in prestigious journals such as Separation Science and Technology, Radiochimica Acta and OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).

In The Last Decade

Dennis Benker

9 papers receiving 52 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Dennis Benker United States	4	27	25	18	17	10	10	54
S. Medley United Kingdom	3	24 0.9×	8 0.3×	8 0.4×	6 0.4×	6 0.6×	3	34
B. Wakeling United Kingdom	3	26 1.0×	8 0.3×	8 0.4×	5 0.3×	8 0.8×	5	36
R. Eschbach France	5	68 2.5×	15 0.6×	8 0.4×	68 4.0×	41 4.1×	12	91
Anoop Kelkar India	6	14 0.5×	27 1.1×	5 0.3×	4 0.2×	24 2.4×	11	66
S. P. Vesnovskii Russia	5	13 0.5×	13 0.5×	3 0.2×	10 0.6×	24 2.4×	9	42
Jean-Pierre Revol Switzerland	4	19 0.7×	3 0.1×	2 0.1×	27 1.6×	12 1.2×	9	45
Andrew Conant United States	5	34 1.3×	13 0.5×	1 0.1×	21 1.2×	14 1.4×	12	52
Shoukang Qiu China	5	26 1.0×	14 0.6×	4 0.2×	1 0.1×	19 1.9×	14	54
K. Insulander Björk Sweden	8	156 5.8×	43 1.7×	6 0.3×	120 7.1×	26 2.6×	20	164
K. Utsunomiya Japan	2	16 0.6×	4 0.2×	5 0.3×	4 0.2×	7 0.7×	2	21

Countries citing papers authored by Dennis Benker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis Benker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis Benker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis Benker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dennis Benker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis Benker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis Benker. The network helps show where Dennis Benker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dennis Benker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dennis Benker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dennis Benker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dennis Benker. Dennis Benker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Robinson, S.M., et al.. (2020). Production of Cf-252 and other transplutonium isotopes at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Radiochimica Acta. 108(9). 737–746. 30 indexed citations

2.

Felker, L. K., et al.. (2015). Reestablishing the Supply of Plutonium-238. 4 indexed citations

3.

McFarlane, Joanna, et al.. (2014). Dissolution and Separation of Aluminum and Aluminosilicates. Separation Science and Technology. 50(18). 2803–2818. 2 indexed citations

4.

Benker, Dennis, et al.. (2012). Recovering Americium and Curium from Mark-42 Target Materials— New Processing Approaches to Enhance Separations and Integrate Waste Stream Disposition-12228. 1 indexed citations

5.

Alexander, C.W., et al.. (2011). Preserving Plutonium-244 as a National Asset. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations

6.

Collins, E.D., et al.. (2010). Analogies of Experience in the U.S. Transuranium Element Production Program with Partitioning and Transmutation of Transuranic Actinides in Commercial Used Fuels. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations

7.

Collins, E.D., et al.. (2008). Results and Implications from the First UREX+ Campaign with Coupled End-to-End (CETE) Process Steps. Transactions American Geophysical Union. 98(1). 125–126. 1 indexed citations

8.

Collins, E.D., et al.. (2008). Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies to Meet Near-Term and Transition Period Requirements. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1 indexed citations

9.

Collins, E.D., et al.. (2005). Development of the UREX+2 Flowsheet - An Advanced Separations Process for Spent Fuel Processing. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society. 93(1). 739–740. 3 indexed citations

10.

Felker, L. K., et al.. (1995). Separation of Americium, Curium, and Plutonium from Irradiated Targets. Separation Science and Technology. 30(7-9). 1769–1778. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact