Denise Stevens
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kathleen R. MerikangasBrenda T. FentonStephanie S. O’MalleyMarilyn StolarMartin PreisigJoseph L. GouletHeping ZhangBruce J. Rounsaville
- Topics
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (23 papers)Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (14 papers)Breast Implant and Reconstruction (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Denise Stevens
50 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Cancer Research 433
- Clinical Psychology 414
- Epidemiology 403
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 388
- Oncology 388
Countries citing papers authored by Denise Stevens
This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Stevens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Stevens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Stevens more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Stevens
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Stevens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Stevens. The network helps show where Denise Stevens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denise Stevens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denise Stevens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denise Stevens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denise Stevens. Denise Stevens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 44 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 51 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 142 | |
| 15 | Embryonic stem cell research: will President Bush's limitation on federal funding put the United States at a disadvantage? A comparison between U.S. and international law. | 3 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 114 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 182 |
About Denise Stevens
Denise Stevens is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Oncology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (23 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (14 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (433 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (358 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (388 citations). Denise Stevens has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kathleen R. Merikangas, Brenda T. Fenton, Stephanie S. O’Malley, Marilyn Stolar, Martin Preisig, Joseph L. Goulet, Heping Zhang, Bruce J. Rounsaville, Neil Risch and Scott W. Woods. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, PLoS ONE and Cancer Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.