Denise M. Parker
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 1%
- Ecology top 2%
- Global and Planetary Change top 2%
- Oceanography top 10%
- Parasitology top 5%
- Co-authors
- George H. BalazsJeffrey J. PolovinaPeter H. DuttonEvan A. HowellMichael P. SekiDonald R. KobayashiItaru UchidaWilliam J. Cooke
- Topics
- Turtle Biology and Conservation (24 papers)Marine animal studies overview (14 papers)Ichthyology and Marine Biology (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Denise M. Parker
25 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.2k
- Ecology 912
- Global and Planetary Change 699
- Oceanography 133
- Parasitology 116
Countries citing papers authored by Denise M. Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of Denise M. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise M. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise M. Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denise M. Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise M. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise M. Parker. The network helps show where Denise M. Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denise M. Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denise M. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denise M. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denise M. Parker. Denise M. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 62 | |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 57 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 100 | |
| 13 | 66 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | Diet of oceanic loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) in the central North Pacific | 95 |
| 16 | 291 | |
| 17 | Dive-depth distribution of loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and olive ridley (Lepidochelys olivacea) sea turtles in the central North Pacific: Might deep longline sets catch fewer turtles? | 102 |
| 18 | An Assessment of the Sea Turtles and Their Marine and Terrestrial Habitats at Saipan, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands | 4 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 50 |
About Denise M. Parker
Denise M. Parker is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Turtle Biology and Conservation (24 papers), Marine animal studies overview (14 papers) and Ichthyology and Marine Biology (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.2k citations), Ecology (912 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (699 citations). Denise M. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include George H. Balazs, Jeffrey J. Polovina, Peter H. Dutton, Evan A. Howell, Michael P. Seki, Donald R. Kobayashi, Itaru Uchida, William J. Cooke, Naoki Kamezaki and I-Jiunn Cheng. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Marine Biology and Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.