Denis Schwartz
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 2%
- Neurology top 2%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Kenneth K. KwongYohan AttalMargarita Sánchez del RíoBruce R. RosenF. Michael CutrerOna WuBruce FischlA. Gregory Sorensen
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (22 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (21 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (21 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Denis Schwartz
44 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.9k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 506
- Neurology 352
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 332
Countries citing papers authored by Denis Schwartz
This map shows the geographic impact of Denis Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denis Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denis Schwartz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denis Schwartz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denis Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denis Schwartz. The network helps show where Denis Schwartz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denis Schwartz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denis Schwartz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denis Schwartz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denis Schwartz. Denis Schwartz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 25 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | Loss of inter-frequency brain hubs in Alzheimer's disease | 2 |
| 13 | 52 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | 182 | |
| 19 | 291 | |
| 20 | 42 |
About Denis Schwartz
Denis Schwartz is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Complementary and Manual Therapy and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 47 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (22 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (21 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.9k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.1k citations) and Neurology (352 citations). Denis Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth K. Kwong, Yohan Attal, Margarita Sánchez del Río, Bruce R. Rosen, F. Michael Cutrer, Ona Wu, Bruce Fischl, A. Gregory Sorensen, Michael A. Moskowitz and Nouchine Hadjikhani. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Neuron and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.