Deborah Topol

610 total citations
10 papers, 419 citations indexed

About

Deborah Topol is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah Topol has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 419 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Clinical Psychology, 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 4 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Deborah Topol's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (4 papers) and Pediatric health and respiratory diseases (3 papers). Deborah Topol is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (5 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (4 papers) and Pediatric health and respiratory diseases (3 papers). Deborah Topol collaborates with scholars based in United States. Deborah Topol's co-authors include Betty R. Vohr, Richard Tucker, Mary Jane Johnson, Henrietta L. Leonard, Susan E. Swedo, Albert J. Allen, Oscar G. Bukstein, David C. Rettew, Judith L. Rapoport and Kenneth C. Rickler and has published in prestigious journals such as PEDIATRICS, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Acta Paediatrica.

In The Last Decade

Deborah Topol

10 papers receiving 388 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Deborah Topol United States	10	245	211	149	113	72	10	419
Robert L. Schum United States	7	249 1.0×	238 1.1×	64 0.4×	138 1.2×	29 0.4×	16	421
Anouk P. Netten Netherlands	11	219 0.9×	209 1.0×	82 0.6×	91 0.8×	37 0.5×	12	394
Adriane Lima Mortari Moret Brazil	12	319 1.3×	179 0.8×	38 0.3×	163 1.4×	31 0.4×	54	421
Jan L. Culbertson United States	9	143 0.6×	93 0.4×	53 0.4×	104 0.9×	70 1.0×	18	329
Laura Button Australia	11	433 1.8×	344 1.6×	78 0.5×	201 1.8×	61 0.8×	14	582
Sherryn Tobin Australia	8	173 0.7×	133 0.6×	56 0.4×	176 1.6×	40 0.6×	8	334
Patricia Van Buynder Australia	12	534 2.2×	312 1.5×	49 0.3×	307 2.7×	50 0.7×	12	640
Margreet Luinge Netherlands	8	130 0.5×	144 0.7×	56 0.4×	54 0.5×	86 1.2×	24	322
Kristina English United States	11	157 0.6×	109 0.5×	44 0.3×	77 0.7×	7 0.1×	45	301
Sarah Granberg Sweden	12	473 1.9×	274 1.3×	24 0.2×	197 1.7×	14 0.2×	31	603

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Topol

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Topol's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Topol with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Topol more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Topol

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Topol. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Topol. The network helps show where Deborah Topol may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Topol

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Topol. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Topol based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Topol. Deborah Topol is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

Vohr, Betty R., et al.. (2013). The importance of language in the home for school‐age children with permanent hearing loss. Acta Paediatrica. 103(1). 62–69. 31 indexed citations

Vohr, Betty R., et al.. (2012). Language outcomes and service provision of preschool children with congenital hearing loss. Early Human Development. 88(7). 493–498. 32 indexed citations

Topol, Deborah, et al.. (2011). The effects of maternal stress and child language ability on behavioral outcomes of children with congenital hearing loss at 18–24months. Early Human Development. 87(12). 807–811. 38 indexed citations

Vohr, Betty R., et al.. (2010). Expressive vocabulary of children with hearing loss in the first 2 years of life: impact of early intervention. Journal of Perinatology. 31(4). 274–280. 58 indexed citations

Vohr, Betty R., et al.. (2010). Association of maternal communicative behavior with child vocabulary at 18–24months for children with congenital hearing loss. Early Human Development. 86(4). 255–260. 25 indexed citations

Vohr, Betty R., et al.. (2008). Early Language Outcomes of Early-Identified Infants With Permanent Hearing Loss at 12 to 16 Months of Age. PEDIATRICS. 122(3). 535–544. 119 indexed citations

Vohr, Betty R., et al.. (2008). Results of Newborn Screening for Hearing Loss. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 162(3). 205–205. 18 indexed citations

Vohr, Betty R., et al.. (2002). Early hearing screening, detection and intervention (EHDI) in Rhode Island.. PubMed. 85(12). 369–72. 9 indexed citations

Leonard, Henrietta L., et al.. (1994). Clonazepam as an Augmenting Agent in the Treatment of Childhood-Onset Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 33(6). 792–794. 53 indexed citations

10.

Leonard, Henrietta L., Susan E. Swedo, Judith L. Rapoport, et al.. (1992). Tourette syndrome and obsessive-compulsive disorder.. PubMed. 58. 83–93. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact