Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Social capital, income inequality, and mortality.
19972.3k citationsIchiro Kawachi, Bruce P. Kennedy et al.American Journal of Public Healthprofile →
Income distribution and mortality: cross sectional ecological study of the Robin Hood index in the United States
1996608 citationsBruce P. Kennedy, Ichiro Kawachi et al.BMJprofile →
Income distribution, socioeconomic status, and self rated health in the United States: multilevel analysis
1998551 citationsBruce P. Kennedy, Ichiro Kawachi et al.BMJprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Prothrow‐Stith
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Prothrow‐Stith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Prothrow‐Stith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Prothrow‐Stith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Prothrow‐Stith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Prothrow‐Stith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Prothrow‐Stith. The network helps show where Deborah Prothrow‐Stith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Prothrow‐Stith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Prothrow‐Stith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Prothrow‐Stith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Prothrow‐Stith. Deborah Prothrow‐Stith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hertz, Marci, Edward De Vos, L. Jonathan Cohen, Rachel Davis, & Deborah Prothrow‐Stith. (2008). Partnerships for Preventing Violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 34(3). S21–S30.5 indexed citations
3.
Allegrante, John P., et al.. (2007). Prentice Hall health.13 indexed citations
Kennedy, Bruce P., Ichiro Kawachi, Roberta Glass, & Deborah Prothrow‐Stith. (1998). Income distribution, socioeconomic status, and self rated health in the United States: multilevel analysis. BMJ. 317(7163). 917–921.551 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Kawachi, Ichiro, Bruce P. Kennedy, Kimberly Lochner, & Deborah Prothrow‐Stith. (1997). Social capital, income inequality, and mortality.. American Journal of Public Health. 87(9). 1491–1498.2260 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Kennedy, Bruce P., Ichiro Kawachi, & Deborah Prothrow‐Stith. (1996). Kennedy and colleagues' reply: Fig 1. BMJ. 313(7066). 1207.2–1207.2.3 indexed citations
12.
Kennedy, Bruce P., Ichiro Kawachi, & Deborah Prothrow‐Stith. (1996). Income distribution and mortality: cross sectional ecological study of the Robin Hood index in the United States. BMJ. 312(7037). 1004–1007.608 indexed citations breakdown →
Boruch, Robert F., et al.. (1991). Violence prevention strategies targeted at the general population of minority youth.. PubMed. 106(3). 247–50.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.