Deborah Liotta

506 total citations
8 papers, 321 citations indexed

About

Deborah Liotta is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Molecular Biology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah Liotta has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 321 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Deborah Liotta's work include Sperm and Testicular Function (7 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (4 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers). Deborah Liotta is often cited by papers focused on Sperm and Testicular Function (7 papers), Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (4 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers). Deborah Liotta collaborates with scholars based in United States. Deborah Liotta's co-authors include Peter N. Schlegel, Gianpiero D. Palermo, Lucinda L. Veeck, Roy A. Brandell, Anna Mielnik, Zhen Ye, Yefim Sheynkin, Sofía T. Menéndez, Campbell Bryson and Jennifer Reifsnyder and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Urology, Human Reproduction and Fertility and Sterility.

In The Last Decade

Deborah Liotta

8 papers receiving 276 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Deborah Liotta United States	4	281	203	184	92	37	8	321
Ronald Carson United States	6	341 1.2×	211 1.0×	201 1.1×	165 1.8×	47 1.3×	12	418
Nieves Cremades Portugal	8	317 1.1×	145 0.7×	116 0.6×	264 2.9×	41 1.1×	10	404
Judith Gianotten Netherlands	8	219 0.8×	177 0.9×	234 1.3×	68 0.7×	15 0.4×	14	362
Isabelle Aknin‐Seifer France	10	249 0.9×	255 1.3×	250 1.4×	75 0.8×	21 0.6×	16	401
Veerle Frederickx Belgium	7	340 1.2×	109 0.5×	54 0.3×	322 3.5×	63 1.7×	7	372
László Nánássy United States	8	193 0.7×	147 0.7×	107 0.6×	182 2.0×	7 0.2×	17	307
Nadia Ouhibi United States	10	113 0.4×	181 0.9×	103 0.6×	243 2.6×	24 0.6×	18	323
F. Nodar Argentina	10	430 1.5×	130 0.6×	84 0.5×	361 3.9×	39 1.1×	36	506
Janielle van der Velden Netherlands	10	73 0.3×	84 0.4×	153 0.8×	85 0.9×	11 0.3×	17	214
L. Kątska-Książkiewicz Poland	10	181 0.6×	116 0.6×	85 0.5×	294 3.2×	27 0.7×	22	342

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Liotta

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Liotta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Liotta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Liotta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Liotta

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Liotta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Liotta. The network helps show where Deborah Liotta may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Liotta

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Liotta. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Liotta based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Liotta. Deborah Liotta is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Ramasamy, Ranjith, Jennifer Reifsnyder, Campbell Bryson, et al.. (2011). Role of tissue digestion and extensive sperm search after microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Fertility and Sterility. 96(2). 299–302. 39 indexed citations

2.

Ramasamy, Ranjith, Jennifer Reifsnyder, Campbell Bryson, et al.. (2011). 2278 ROLE OF TISSUE DIGESTION AND EXTENSIVE SPERM SEARCH AFTER MICRODISSECTION TESTICULAR SPERM EXTRACTION. The Journal of Urology. 185(4S). 3 indexed citations

3.

Hariprashad, June, et al.. (2002). ICSI as a therapeutic measure for failed conventional in-vitro fertilization cycles: the cornell experience. Fertility and Sterility. 78. S17–S17. 2 indexed citations

4.

Liotta, Deborah, et al.. (2002). Is pentoxifylline treatment of sperm before ICSI detrimental to subsequent preembryo development?. Fertility and Sterility. 78. S190–S190. 1 indexed citations

5.

Schiff, Jonathan D., Gianpiero D. Palermo, Takumi Takeuchi, et al.. (2002). Success of TESE-ICSI in men with non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome. Fertility and Sterility. 78. S248–S248. 2 indexed citations

6.

Sheynkin, Yefim, et al.. (1998). Controlled comparison of percutaneous and microsurgical sperm retrieval in men with obstructive azoospermia. Human Reproduction. 13(11). 3086–3089. 37 indexed citations

7.

Liotta, Deborah, et al.. (1998). Testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia: results of a multibiopsy approach with optimized tissue dispersion. Urology. 52(4). 692–696. 73 indexed citations

8.

Brandell, Roy A., Anna Mielnik, Deborah Liotta, et al.. (1998). AZFb deletions predict the absence of spermatozoa with testicular sperm extraction: preliminary report of a prognostic genetic test. Human Reproduction. 13(10). 2812–2815. 164 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact