Deborah L. Finke

6.3k total citations
63 papers, 4.3k citations indexed

About

Deborah L. Finke is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah L. Finke has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 4.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Insect Science, 35 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 26 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Deborah L. Finke's work include Plant and animal studies (31 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (29 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers). Deborah L. Finke is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (31 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (29 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (17 papers). Deborah L. Finke collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Egypt. Deborah L. Finke's co-authors include Robert F. Denno, William E. Snyder, Micky D. Eubanks, Peter W. Price, Ian Kaplan, Claudio Gratton, Cory S. Straub, Gail Langellotto, Andrea F. Huberty and Merrill A. Peterson and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Deborah L. Finke

59 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah L. Finke United States 27 2.2k 2.1k 1.5k 1.3k 1.2k 63 4.3k
Karen Goodell United States 18 1.2k 0.5× 1.9k 0.9× 1.1k 0.7× 1.0k 0.8× 1.3k 1.1× 40 3.3k
Peter A. Hambäck Sweden 34 1.2k 0.6× 2.2k 1.0× 2.1k 1.4× 1.1k 0.8× 1.7k 1.5× 124 4.4k
Nora Underwood United States 25 1.1k 0.5× 1.7k 0.8× 1.1k 0.8× 959 0.7× 1.3k 1.1× 64 3.3k
Kailen A. Mooney United States 34 1.2k 0.5× 2.4k 1.1× 1.2k 0.8× 1.0k 0.8× 1.6k 1.4× 103 3.6k
Tatyana A. Rand United States 27 1.8k 0.8× 1.9k 0.9× 1.1k 0.7× 1.3k 1.0× 1.3k 1.1× 67 3.5k
F. J. Frank van Veen United Kingdom 25 1.0k 0.5× 1.7k 0.8× 894 0.6× 919 0.7× 832 0.7× 57 3.0k
Dennis J. O’Dowd Australia 36 1.6k 0.7× 2.8k 1.3× 1.5k 1.0× 1.2k 0.9× 1.5k 1.2× 78 4.5k
Gina M. Wimp United States 25 817 0.4× 1.7k 0.8× 1.1k 0.8× 798 0.6× 1.3k 1.1× 52 3.2k
Thomas C. R. White Australia 15 1.4k 0.6× 1.5k 0.7× 1.6k 1.1× 958 0.7× 1.1k 0.9× 27 3.4k
Robert C. Venette United States 36 2.5k 1.1× 1.1k 0.5× 1.6k 1.1× 2.1k 1.6× 397 0.3× 119 4.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah L. Finke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah L. Finke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah L. Finke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah L. Finke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah L. Finke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah L. Finke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah L. Finke. The network helps show where Deborah L. Finke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah L. Finke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah L. Finke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah L. Finke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah L. Finke. Deborah L. Finke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vidal, Mayra C., Mariana Abarca, Deborah L. Finke, et al.. (2025). What do we know about insect responses to global change? A review of meta‐analyses on global change drivers. Insect Conservation and Diversity. 18(6). 900–916.
2.
Veum, Kristen S., et al.. (2024). Soil microbes from conservation agriculture systems reduce growth of Bt-resistant western corn rootworm larvae. Journal of Pest Science. 97(3). 1677–1689.
3.
Hall, Damon M., et al.. (2023). Who cares about monarch butterflies? Comparing US State Wildlife Action Plans 2015–2025. Conservation Letters. 16(6). 1 indexed citations
4.
Basu, Saumik, et al.. (2022). Plant Water Stress Reduces Aphid Performance: Exploring Mechanisms Driven by Water Stress Intensity. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 10. 20 indexed citations
5.
Burkness, E. C., Christina DiFonzo, Deborah L. Finke, et al.. (2021). Presence–Absence Sampling Plans for Stink Bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) in the Midwest Region of the United States. Journal of Economic Entomology. 114(3). 1362–1372. 1 indexed citations
6.
Crowder, David W., et al.. (2021). Primacy of plants in driving the response of arthropod communities to drought. Oecologia. 195(4). 833–842. 11 indexed citations
7.
Finke, Deborah L., et al.. (2021). Effects of Plant Stress on Aphid–Parasitoid Interactions: Drought Improves Aphid Suppression. Environmental Entomology. 50(3). 713–718. 10 indexed citations
8.
Li, Xiaofei, Jianyong Wang, Hui Zhu, et al.. (2021). Effects of grazing on C:N:P stoichiometry attenuate from soils to plants and insect herbivores in a semi-arid grassland. Oecologia. 195(3). 785–795. 11 indexed citations
9.
Nalam, Vamsi J., et al.. (2020). Plant water stress intensity mediates aphid host choice and feeding behaviour. Ecological Entomology. 45(6). 1437–1444. 24 indexed citations
10.
Nalam, Vamsi J., et al.. (2020). Diurnal feeding as a potential mechanism of osmoregulation in aphids. Insect Science. 28(2). 521–532. 17 indexed citations
11.
Abdala‐Roberts, Luis, Adriana Puentes, Deborah L. Finke, et al.. (2019). Tri‐trophic interactions: bridging species, communities and ecosystems. Ecology Letters. 22(12). 2151–2167. 79 indexed citations
12.
Crowder, David W., Jing Li, Elizabeth T. Borer, et al.. (2019). Species interactions affect the spread of vector‐borne plant pathogens independent of transmission mode. Ecology. 100(9). e02782–e02782. 28 indexed citations
13.
Finke, Deborah L., et al.. (2018). Multi-species suppression of herbivores through consumptive and non-consumptive effects. PLoS ONE. 13(5). e0197230–e0197230. 14 indexed citations
14.
Sharp, Robert E., et al.. (2016). The Effect of Western Corn Rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and Water Deficit on Maize Performance Under Controlled Conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology. 109(2). 684–698. 6 indexed citations
15.
Finke, Deborah L., et al.. (2016). Mechanisms Underlying the Nonconsumptive Effects of Parasitoid Wasps on Aphids. Environmental Entomology. 46(1). nvw151–nvw151. 22 indexed citations
16.
Long, Elizabeth Y & Deborah L. Finke. (2014). Contribution of Predator Identity to the Suppression of Herbivores by a Diverse Predator Assemblage. Environmental Entomology. 43(3). 569–576. 23 indexed citations
17.
Long, Elizabeth Y, et al.. (2013). A negative effect of a pathogen on its vector? A plant pathogen increases the vulnerability of its vector to attack by natural enemies. Oecologia. 174(4). 1169–1177. 26 indexed citations
18.
Eubanks, Micky D., Michael J. Raupp, & Deborah L. Finke. (2010). Robert F. Denno (1945–2008): Insect Ecologist Extraordinaire. Annual Review of Entomology. 56(1). 273–292. 1 indexed citations
19.
Finke, Deborah L. & Robert F. Denno. (2004). Predator diversity dampens trophic cascades. Nature. 429(6990). 407–410. 423 indexed citations
20.
Finke, Deborah L. & Robert F. Denno. (2002). Intraguild Predation Diminished in Complex-Structured Vegetation: Implications for Prey Suppression. Ecology. 83(3). 643–643. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026