Deborah Ford
Impact in
- Accounting top 10%
- Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
- Corporate Finance and Governance
- Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
- Finance top 10%
- Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Papers in
-
- Housing Market and Economics 7
- Insurance and Financial Risk Management 2
-
- Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis 3
- Co-authors
- George H. Hempel (1 shared paper)M. Cynthia Logsdon (1 shared paper)Daniel A. Gerlowski (1 shared paper)Hung‐Gay Fung (1 shared paper)Ting Zhang (1 shared paper)Elizabeth Redmond (1 shared paper)Sudha Raj (1 shared paper)H. Arsham (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Real Estate Economics (3 papers)Bereavement Care (1 paper)Nurse Educator (1 paper)Journal of Real Estate Research (1 paper)Journal for Nurses in Professional Development (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Deborah Ford
16 papers receiving 218 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Accounting 101
- Finance 74
- Economics and Econometrics 139
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 6
- Urban Studies 18
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Ford
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Ford. The network helps show where Deborah Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 127 | |
| 2 | 1989 | 69 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 12 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1982 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 16 | REITs : new opportunities in real estate investment trust securities | 1987 | 1 |
About Deborah Ford
Deborah Ford is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Finance, having authored 16 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Housing Market and Economics (7 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (3 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (2 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (2 papers), Disaster Response and Management (2 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (1 paper), Obesity and Health Practices (1 paper) and Art History and Market Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (101 citations), Finance (74 citations), Economics and Econometrics (139 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (6 citations) and Urban Studies (18 citations). Deborah Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include George H. Hempel, M. Cynthia Logsdon, Daniel A. Gerlowski, Hung‐Gay Fung, Ting Zhang, Elizabeth Redmond, Sudha Raj, H. Arsham, Sarah Ward and Derek Fraser. Their work appears in journals such as Real Estate Economics, Bereavement Care, Nurse Educator, Journal of Real Estate Research and Journal for Nurses in Professional Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.