Deborah Dang

1.0k total citations
22 papers, 739 citations indexed

About

Deborah Dang is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah Dang has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 739 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in General Health Professions, 6 papers in Emergency Medical Services and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Deborah Dang's work include Workplace Violence and Bullying (5 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (5 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (4 papers). Deborah Dang is often cited by papers focused on Workplace Violence and Bullying (5 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (5 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (4 papers). Deborah Dang collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and South Korea. Deborah Dang's co-authors include Sandra L. Dearholt, Dorothy Nyberg, Peter J. Pronovost, Mollie W. Jenckes, Eric B Bass, Mary E. Johantgen, Miyong T. Kim, Elizabeth Garrett, Todd Dorman and Pamela A. Lipsett and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Critical Care Medicine and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Deborah Dang

22 papers receiving 659 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah Dang United States 15 286 168 156 104 88 22 739
J. Margo Brooks Carthon United States 17 547 1.9× 199 1.2× 98 0.6× 117 1.1× 139 1.6× 52 913
Deborah H. Eldredge United States 9 325 1.1× 139 0.8× 96 0.6× 248 2.4× 81 0.9× 15 775
Sina Valiee Iran 15 202 0.7× 143 0.9× 123 0.8× 94 0.9× 32 0.4× 81 727
Kersti Theander Sweden 22 474 1.7× 190 1.1× 147 0.9× 190 1.8× 31 0.4× 42 1.3k
Julia Slark New Zealand 17 168 0.6× 99 0.6× 52 0.3× 151 1.5× 109 1.2× 60 795
Panayiota Andreou Cyprus 16 535 1.9× 101 0.6× 66 0.4× 162 1.6× 106 1.2× 30 1.0k
Linda D. Urden United States 14 411 1.4× 141 0.8× 35 0.2× 127 1.2× 105 1.2× 38 871
Charlotte Thomas‐Hawkins United States 17 314 1.1× 233 1.4× 37 0.2× 80 0.8× 41 0.5× 47 857
Carolyn C. Kee United States 17 430 1.5× 92 0.5× 56 0.4× 165 1.6× 117 1.3× 39 969
Judith Donoghue Australia 19 462 1.6× 163 1.0× 36 0.2× 162 1.6× 76 0.9× 58 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Dang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Dang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Dang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Dang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Dang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Dang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Dang. The network helps show where Deborah Dang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Dang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Dang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Dang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Dang. Deborah Dang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dang, Deborah, et al.. (2022). “Where You Feel Like a Family Instead of Co-workers”: a Mixed Methods Study on Care Teams and Burnout. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 38(2). 341–350. 7 indexed citations
2.
Blakeney, Erin Abu‐Rish, Frances Chu, Andrew A. White, et al.. (2021). A scoping review of new implementations of interprofessional bedside rounding models to improve teamwork, care, and outcomes in hospitals. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 38(3). 411–426. 20 indexed citations
3.
Everly, George S., et al.. (2020). Leadership Principles to Decrease Psychological Casualties in COVID-19 and Other Disasters of Uncertainty. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness. 16(2). 767–769. 18 indexed citations
4.
Morris, Matthew C., et al.. (2020). Development and Evaluation of a Nurse Leadership Succession Planning Strategy in an Academic Medical Center. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 50(7/8). 378–384. 8 indexed citations
5.
Dearholt, Sandra L. & Deborah Dang. (2017). Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Models and Guidelines. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 41 indexed citations
6.
Dang, Deborah, et al.. (2015). Do Clinician Disruptive Behaviors Make an Unsafe Environment for Patients?. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 31(2). 115–123. 26 indexed citations
7.
Beier, Eric E., Tzong‐Jen Sheu, Deborah Dang, et al.. (2015). Heavy Metal Ion Regulation of Gene Expression. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 290(29). 18216–18226. 30 indexed citations
8.
Dang, Deborah, et al.. (2014). Development and Validation of the Johns Hopkins Disruptive Clinician Behavior Survey. American Journal of Medical Quality. 30(5). 470–476. 17 indexed citations
9.
Jeffries, Pamela R., Linda Rose, Anne E. Belcher, et al.. (2013). A Clinical Academic Practice Partnership: A Clinical Education Redesign. Journal of Professional Nursing. 29(3). 128–136. 33 indexed citations
10.
Dang, Deborah, et al.. (2012). An Organizational Assessment of Disruptive Clinician Behavior. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 28(2). 110–121. 38 indexed citations
11.
Dang, Deborah, et al.. (2010). Hospital RNs' Experiences With Disruptive Behavior. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 25(2). 105–116. 64 indexed citations
12.
Dang, Deborah, et al.. (2007). Quest for the Ideal. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 22(1). 11–17. 4 indexed citations
13.
Becker, Kathleen, Deborah Dang, Elizabeth Jordan, et al.. (2007). An evaluation framework for faculty practice. Nursing Outlook. 55(1). 44–54. 13 indexed citations
14.
Dang, Deborah, Mary E. Johantgen, Peter J. Pronovost, Mollie W. Jenckes, & Eric B Bass. (2002). Postoperative complications: Does intensive care unit staff nursing make a difference?. Heart & Lung. 31(3). 219–228. 95 indexed citations
15.
Newhouse, Robin & Deborah Dang. (2001). Measuring Role Changes for Nurses. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 31(4). 173–175. 1 indexed citations
16.
Nolan, Marie T., et al.. (2001). Ensuring Safety of Patients Receiving Sedation for Procedures: Evaluation of Clinical Practice Guidelines. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement. 27(1). 28–41. 47 indexed citations
17.
Pronovost, Peter J., Deborah Dang, Todd Dorman, et al.. (2001). Intensive care unit nurse staffing and the risk for complications after abdominal aortic surgery.. PubMed. 4(5). 199–206. 94 indexed citations
18.
Nolan, Marie T., et al.. (2000). Unifying Organizational Approaches to Measuring and Managing Patient Outcomes. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 30(1). 27–33. 2 indexed citations
19.
Pronovost, Peter J., Deborah Dang, Todd Dorman, et al.. (1999). ICU NURSE TO PATIENT RATIO GREATER THAN 1 TO 2 ASSOCIATED WITH AN INCREASED RISK OF COMPLICATIONS IN ABDOMINAL AORTIC SURGERY PATIENTS.. Critical Care Medicine. 27(Supplement). A27–A27. 1 indexed citations
20.
Dang, Deborah, et al.. (1996). Episode treatment groups: an illness classification and episode building system--Part I.. PubMed. 9(3). 118–22. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026