Deborah Arnott

1.9k total citations
58 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Deborah Arnott is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah Arnott has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Physiology, 21 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 10 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Deborah Arnott's work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (33 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (17 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (10 papers). Deborah Arnott is often cited by papers focused on Smoking Behavior and Cessation (33 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (17 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (10 papers). Deborah Arnott collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Deborah Arnott's co-authors include Ann McNeill, Martin Dockrell, Hazel Cheeseman, John Britton, David Hammond, Linda Bauld, Leonie S. Brose, Nicholas S Hopkinson, Andy Lee and Katherine East and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Lancet and BMJ.

In The Last Decade

Deborah Arnott

54 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah Arnott United Kingdom 19 945 455 218 194 118 58 1.3k
Martin Dockrell United Kingdom 17 1.2k 1.3× 577 1.3× 280 1.3× 207 1.1× 131 1.1× 31 1.6k
Brett R. Loomis United States 21 962 1.0× 452 1.0× 159 0.7× 250 1.3× 94 0.8× 39 1.3k
Mark Gottlieb United States 17 786 0.8× 413 0.9× 153 0.7× 256 1.3× 169 1.4× 35 1.3k
Mary Hrywna United States 21 969 1.0× 482 1.1× 200 0.9× 121 0.6× 78 0.7× 72 1.4k
David Sweanor Canada 16 869 0.9× 334 0.7× 197 0.9× 194 1.0× 75 0.6× 39 1.1k
Christian Boudreau Canada 22 1.1k 1.2× 504 1.1× 403 1.8× 145 0.7× 119 1.0× 46 1.9k
Youn Ok Lee United States 20 1.3k 1.4× 540 1.2× 398 1.8× 161 0.8× 132 1.1× 39 1.6k
Anne C K Quah Canada 25 1.5k 1.6× 542 1.2× 389 1.8× 280 1.4× 141 1.2× 110 1.9k
Greg Connolly United States 11 659 0.7× 214 0.5× 95 0.4× 239 1.2× 143 1.2× 19 925
John A. Tauras United States 18 875 0.9× 504 1.1× 133 0.6× 203 1.0× 86 0.7× 47 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Arnott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Arnott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Arnott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Arnott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Arnott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Arnott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Arnott. The network helps show where Deborah Arnott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Arnott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Arnott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Arnott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Arnott. Deborah Arnott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Simonavičius, Erikas, Leonie S. Brose, Ann McNeill, et al.. (2025). Investigating the Appeal of Nicotine Pouch Packaging, Flavour, and Nicotine Descriptors Among Adults in the UK: An Online Experiment. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 28(2). 251–259. 3 indexed citations
2.
Langley, Tessa, et al.. (2024). Attitudes and Exposure to Illicit Tobacco in England, 2022. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 26(11). 1591–1594.
3.
Jackson, Sarah E., Jamie Brown, Lion Shahab, et al.. (2024). Nicotine strength of e‐liquids used by adult vapers in Great Britain: A population survey 2016 to 2024. Addiction. 120(3). 468–482. 4 indexed citations
4.
Williams, Parris, et al.. (2023). Use of tobacco and e-cigarettes among youth in Great Britainin 2022: Analysis of a cross-sectional survey. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 21(January). 1–9. 9 indexed citations
5.
Hammond, David, et al.. (2023). Marketing claims on the websites of leading e-cigarette brands in England. Tobacco Control. 34(1). 21–27. 2 indexed citations
6.
7.
Branston, J Robert, et al.. (2020). Cigarette-like cigarillo introduced to bypass taxation, standardised packaging, minimum pack sizes, and menthol ban in the UK. Tobacco Control. 30(6). 708–711. 18 indexed citations
8.
Simonavičius, Erikas, Ann McNeill, Hazel Cheeseman, Deborah Arnott, & Leonie S. Brose. (2020). Smokers who have not tried alternative nicotine products: a 2019 survey of adults in Great Britain. Harm Reduction Journal. 17(1). 46–46. 5 indexed citations
9.
Beard, Emma, Jamie Brown, Sarah E. Jackson, et al.. (2020). Long-term evaluation of the rise in legal age-of-sale of cigarettes from 16 to 18 in England: a trend analysis. BMC Medicine. 18(1). 85–85. 9 indexed citations
10.
Hiscock, Rosemary, et al.. (2018). Stop Smoking Practitioners’ understanding of e-cigarettes’ use and efficacy with particular reference to vapers’ socioeconomic status. The Journal of Smoking Cessation. 14(1). 21–31. 3 indexed citations
11.
Simonavičius, Erikas, Ann McNeill, Deborah Arnott, & Leonie S. Brose. (2017). What factors are associated with current smokers using or stopping e-cigarette use?. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 173. 139–143. 60 indexed citations
12.
Eastwood, Brian J., Martin Dockrell, Deborah Arnott, et al.. (2015). Electronic cigarette use in young people in Great Britain 2013–2014. Public Health. 129(9). 1150–1156. 60 indexed citations
13.
West, Robert, et al.. (2014). Electronic cigarettes: what we know so far. UCL Discovery (University College London). 4 indexed citations
14.
Hiscock, Rosemary, Maciej Ł. Goniewicz, Andy McEwen, et al.. (2014). E-cigarettes: online survey of UK smoking cessation practitioners. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 12(1). 13–13. 35 indexed citations
15.
Hammond, David, et al.. (2013). The perceptions of UK youth of branded and standardized, 'plain' cigarette packaging. European Journal of Public Health. 24(4). 537–543. 29 indexed citations
16.
West, Robert, Joy Townsend, Luk Joossens, Deborah Arnott, & Sarah Lewis. (2008). Why combating tobacco smuggling is a priority. BMJ. 337(oct09 2). a1933–a1933. 21 indexed citations
17.
Hammond, David, Friedrich J. Wiebel, Lynn T. Kozlowski, et al.. (2007). Revising the machine smoking regime for cigarette emissions: implications for tobacco control policy. Tobacco Control. 16(1). 8–14. 68 indexed citations
18.
Raw, Martin, Ann McNeill, Robert West, Megan Armstrong, & Deborah Arnott. (2005). Cut Down Then Stop (CDTS): Guidance for Health Professionals on this New Indication for Nicotine Replacement Therapy.. UCL Discovery (University College London). 2 indexed citations
19.
Lewis, Sarah, Deborah Arnott, Catherine Godfrey, & John Britton. (2005). Public health measures to reduce smoking prevalence in the UK: how many lives could be saved?. Tobacco Control. 14(4). 251–254. 14 indexed citations
20.
Irvine, W.T., et al.. (1961). REDUCTION IN COLONIC MUCOSAL ABSORPTION WITH REFERENCE TO THE CHEMICAL IMBALANCE OF URETEROCOLOSTOMY1. British Journal of Urology. 33(1). 1–18. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026