Debora van Dam
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Migration, Health and Trauma
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Resilience and Mental Health
Papers in
-
- Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research 4
- Migration, Health and Trauma 3
- Child Abuse and Trauma 3
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 1
-
- Occupational Health and Performance 1
- Co-authors
- Paul M.G. Emmelkamp (4 shared papers)Thomas Ehring (4 shared papers)Ellen Vedel (4 shared papers)Wiepke Cahn (1 shared paper)D. Wiersma (1 shared paper)Inez Myin‐Germeys (1 shared paper)Marlies P. Schijven (1 shared paper)Jim van Os (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (2 papers)Schizophrenia Bulletin (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)Clinical Psychology Review (1 paper)BMC Psychiatry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsSaudi ArabiaGermany
In The Last Decade
Debora van Dam
6 papers receiving 272 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Clinical Psychology 207
- Behavioral Neuroscience 7
- Applied Psychology 10
- Epidemiology 67
- Psychiatry and Mental health 29
Countries citing papers authored by Debora van Dam
This map shows the geographic impact of Debora van Dam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debora van Dam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debora van Dam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Debora van Dam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debora van Dam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debora van Dam. The network helps show where Debora van Dam may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside Debora van Dam, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 118 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 69 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 17 |
About Debora van Dam
Debora van Dam is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Occupational Therapy, Health Information Management, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 6 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper), Occupational Health and Performance (1 paper) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (207 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (7 citations), Applied Psychology (10 citations), Epidemiology (67 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (29 citations). Debora van Dam has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Saudi Arabia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paul M.G. Emmelkamp, Thomas Ehring, Ellen Vedel, Wiepke Cahn, D. Wiersma, Inez Myin‐Germeys, Marlies P. Schijven, Jim van Os, Tom H van de Belt and René S. Kahn. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, Schizophrenia Bulletin, BMJ Open, Clinical Psychology Review and BMC Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.