Debby H. Chao
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Surgery top 10%
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Allan J. PantuckAmnon ZismanArie S. BelldegrunRobert A. FiglinJonathan SaidFredrick DoreyBarbara J. GitlitzJean B. deKernion
- Topics
- Renal cell carcinoma treatment (18 papers)Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (11 papers)Renal and related cancers (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Debby H. Chao
23 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.4k
- Molecular Biology 990
- Surgery 514
- Cancer Research 487
- Oncology 330
Countries citing papers authored by Debby H. Chao
This map shows the geographic impact of Debby H. Chao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debby H. Chao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debby H. Chao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Debby H. Chao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debby H. Chao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debby H. Chao. The network helps show where Debby H. Chao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Debby H. Chao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Debby H. Chao. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Debby H. Chao based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Debby H. Chao. Debby H. Chao is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | |
| 2 | 128 | |
| 3 | 135 | |
| 4 | 73 | |
| 5 | 193 | |
| 6 | 78 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 82 | |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | 49 | |
| 11 | 89 | |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | Risk Group Assessment and Clinical Outcome Algorithm to Predict the Natural History of Patients With Surgically Resected Renal Cell Carcinomabreakdown → | 501 |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | Rethinking staging and treatment for renal cell cancer. | 0 |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 107 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Debby H. Chao
Debby H. Chao is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cancer Research and Oncology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal cell carcinoma treatment (18 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (11 papers) and Renal and related cancers (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.4k citations), Cancer Research (487 citations) and Molecular Biology (990 citations). Debby H. Chao has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Allan J. Pantuck, Amnon Zisman, Arie S. Belldegrun, Robert A. Figlin, Jonathan Said, Fredrick Dorey, Barbara J. Gitlitz, Jean B. deKernion, Ken‐ryu Han and Stephen J. Freedland. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer and The Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.