Dean M. DeNicola

1.1k total citations
22 papers, 711 citations indexed

About

Dean M. DeNicola is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Ecology and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Dean M. DeNicola has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 711 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Environmental Chemistry, 12 papers in Ecology and 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Dean M. DeNicola's work include Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (11 papers), Mine drainage and remediation techniques (8 papers) and Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (6 papers). Dean M. DeNicola is often cited by papers focused on Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (11 papers), Mine drainage and remediation techniques (8 papers) and Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (6 papers). Dean M. DeNicola collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Dean M. DeNicola's co-authors include Michael G. Stapleton, Martyn Kelly, Kenneth Irvine, Elvira de Eyto, C. David McIntire, Thomas H. DeLuca, Laurie E. Drinkwater, Virginia I. Miller, Kyle D. Hoagland and Raymond J. Lewis and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Pollution, Ecological Indicators and Freshwater Biology.

In The Last Decade

Dean M. DeNicola

22 papers receiving 660 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dean M. DeNicola United States 14 406 386 202 127 110 22 711
Nathan J. Smucker United States 18 329 0.8× 492 1.3× 217 1.1× 179 1.4× 82 0.7× 35 795
Steven T. Rier United States 17 431 1.1× 621 1.6× 82 0.4× 242 1.9× 165 1.5× 23 948
Natalie J. Oram Netherlands 11 125 0.3× 271 0.7× 80 0.4× 92 0.7× 76 0.7× 17 877
Juliane Lilienfein Germany 21 288 0.7× 234 0.6× 78 0.4× 123 1.0× 35 0.3× 31 974
Brent J. Bellinger United States 12 156 0.4× 250 0.6× 148 0.7× 61 0.5× 120 1.1× 25 500
Justin N. Murdock United States 14 309 0.8× 292 0.8× 54 0.3× 198 1.6× 75 0.7× 30 731
J. Prygiel France 14 396 1.0× 575 1.5× 608 3.0× 95 0.7× 119 1.1× 27 981
Montserrat Real Spain 11 203 0.5× 279 0.7× 64 0.3× 100 0.8× 80 0.7× 21 563
Jaume Cambra Spain 11 196 0.5× 260 0.7× 212 1.0× 45 0.4× 44 0.4× 30 477
Piotr Zieliński Poland 17 412 1.0× 520 1.3× 45 0.2× 73 0.6× 290 2.6× 55 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Dean M. DeNicola

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dean M. DeNicola's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dean M. DeNicola with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dean M. DeNicola more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dean M. DeNicola

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dean M. DeNicola. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dean M. DeNicola. The network helps show where Dean M. DeNicola may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dean M. DeNicola

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dean M. DeNicola. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dean M. DeNicola based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dean M. DeNicola. Dean M. DeNicola is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
DeNicola, Dean M., et al.. (2021). Passive Treatment for Acid Mine Drainage Partially Restores Microbial Community Structure in Different Stream Habitats. Water. 13(22). 3300–3300. 7 indexed citations
2.
DeNicola, Dean M., et al.. (2021). A stochastic model of epilithic algal succession and patch dynamics in streams. Ecosphere. 12(7). 6 indexed citations
3.
DeNicola, Dean M. & Michael G. Stapleton. (2016). Using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological integrity of streams remediated for acid mine drainage. Restoration Ecology. 24(5). 656–667. 10 indexed citations
4.
DeNicola, Dean M., et al.. (2015). Nutrient limitation of algal periphyton in streams along an acid mine drainage gradient. Journal of Phycology. 51(4). 739–749. 17 indexed citations
5.
DeNicola, Dean M. & Martyn Kelly. (2014). Role of periphyton in ecological assessment of lakes. Freshwater Science. 33(2). 619–638. 55 indexed citations
6.
DeNicola, Dean M. & Michael G. Stapleton. (2014). Benthic diatoms as indicators of long-term changes in a watershed receiving passive treatment for acid mine drainage. Hydrobiologia. 732(1). 29–48. 15 indexed citations
7.
DeNicola, Dean M., et al.. (2012). Epilithic Community Metabolism as an Indicator of Impact and Recovery in Streams Affected by Acid Mine Drainage. Environmental Management. 50(6). 1035–1046. 10 indexed citations
8.
DeNicola, Dean M., et al.. (2006). Periphyton response to nutrient addition in 3 lakes of different benthic productivity. Journal of the North American Benthological Society. 25(3). 616–631. 38 indexed citations
9.
Constable, John V. H., et al.. (2006). Temporal and light-based changes in carbon uptake and storage in the spring ephemeral Podophyllum peltatum (Berberidaceae). Environmental and Experimental Botany. 60(1). 112–120. 14 indexed citations
10.
DeNicola, Dean M., et al.. (2004). USING EPILITHIC ALGAL COMMUNITIES TO ASSESS TROPHIC STATUS IN IRISH LAKES1. Journal of Phycology. 40(3). 481–495. 45 indexed citations
11.
DeNicola, Dean M. & Michael G. Stapleton. (2002). Impact of acid mine drainage on benthic communities in streams: the relative roles of substratum vs. aqueous effects. Environmental Pollution. 119(3). 303–315. 144 indexed citations
12.
DeNicola, Dean M.. (2000). A review of diatoms found in highly acidic environments. Hydrobiologia. 433(1-3). 111–122. 129 indexed citations
13.
DeNicola, Dean M. & Michael G. Stapleton. (2000). Recovery of streams following passive treatment for acid mine drainage. SIL Proceedings 1922-2010. 27(5). 3034–3039. 3 indexed citations
14.
Lewis, Raymond J., et al.. (1997). Genetic variation in the diatomFragilaria capucina (Fragilariaceae) along a latitudinal gradient across North America. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 204(1-2). 99–108. 36 indexed citations
15.
DeNicola, Dean M.. (1996). Periphyton responses to temperature at different ecological levels.. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 149–181. 61 indexed citations
16.
DeLuca, Thomas H., et al.. (1996). Free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria in temperate cropping systems: Influence of nitrogen source. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 23(2). 140–144. 2 indexed citations
17.
DeLuca, Thomas H., et al.. (1996). Free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria in temperate cropping systems: Influence of nitrogen source. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 23(2). 140–144. 30 indexed citations
18.
Lamberti, Gary A., Stan Gregory, Charles P. Hawkins, et al.. (1992). Plant—herbivore interactions in streams near Mount St Helens. Freshwater Biology. 27(2). 237–247. 29 indexed citations
19.
DeNicola, Dean M. & C. David McIntire. (1990). EFFECTS OF SUBSTRATE RELIEF ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF PERIPHYTON IN LABORATORY STREAMS, I. HYDROLOGY1. Journal of Phycology. 26(4). 624–633. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026