Dean E. Rochester
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Transgenic Plants and Applications
- Horticulture top 10%
Papers in
-
- Counseling Practices and Supervision 8
-
- Plant Virus Research Studies 4
- Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics 2
- Co-authors
- Dilip M. Shah (2 shared papers)Roger N. Beachy (4 shared papers)Robert T. Fraley (2 shared papers)Frederick J. Perlak (1 shared paper)Katherine S. Bowdish (1 shared paper)Stephen G. Rogers (1 shared paper)Sheila McCormick (1 shared paper)Ernest Mayer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Counselor Education and Supervision (7 papers)Journal of Counseling Psychology (2 papers)Virology (2 papers)Nature Biotechnology (2 papers)The EMBO Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dean E. Rochester
18 papers receiving 789 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Biotechnology 191
- Horticulture 20
- Plant Science 592
- Insect Science 171
- Endocrinology 70
Countries citing papers authored by Dean E. Rochester
This map shows the geographic impact of Dean E. Rochester's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dean E. Rochester with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dean E. Rochester more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dean E. Rochester
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dean E. Rochester. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dean E. Rochester. The network helps show where Dean E. Rochester may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Dean E. Rochester, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 294 | |
| 2 | 1986 | 244 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 79 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 68 | |
| 5 | 1987 | 67 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 66 | |
| 7 | 1967 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1966 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1970 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1969 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1968 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1970 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1972 | 2 | |
| 15 | An Investigation of Seniors' Satisfaction with Majors. | 1970 | 1 |
| 16 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1969 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1973 | 1 |
About Dean E. Rochester
Dean E. Rochester is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology and Endocrinology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 863 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Counseling Practices and Supervision (8 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (4 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (3 papers), Transgenic Plants and Applications (3 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (2 papers) and Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (191 citations), Horticulture (20 citations), Plant Science (592 citations), Insect Science (171 citations) and Endocrinology (70 citations). Dean E. Rochester has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dilip M. Shah, Roger N. Beachy, Robert T. Fraley, Frederick J. Perlak, Katherine S. Bowdish, Stephen G. Rogers, Sheila McCormick, Ernest Mayer, David A. Fischhoff and Pamela G. Marrone. Their work appears in journals such as Counselor Education and Supervision, Journal of Counseling Psychology, Virology, Nature Biotechnology and The EMBO Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.