D.C. Naseby
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Soil Science top 5%
- Pollution top 10%
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- J. M. LynchJosé Antonio PascualJim LynchVipul GohelAyten KaracaNigel J. BaintonDaniel R. BeniacKathryn Bernard
- Topics
- Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (9 papers)Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (8 papers)Nematode management and characterization studies (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Soil SciencePlant SciencePollution
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIndiaCanada
In The Last Decade
D.C. Naseby
20 papers receiving 674 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Plant Science 452
- Molecular Biology 183
- Soil Science 148
- Pollution 84
- Ecology 71
Countries citing papers authored by D.C. Naseby
This map shows the geographic impact of D.C. Naseby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.C. Naseby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.C. Naseby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by D.C. Naseby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.C. Naseby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.C. Naseby. The network helps show where D.C. Naseby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D.C. Naseby
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D.C. Naseby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D.C. Naseby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D.C. Naseby. D.C. Naseby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | The effect of soil pH on photo-catalytic oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) | 4 |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | A study of the role of silicon in the control of strawberry powdery mildew (Podosphaera aphanis) in a field trial. | 1 |
| 7 | 62 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 44 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 175 | |
| 14 | 47 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 28 | |
| 18 | 61 | |
| 19 | Functional impact of genetically modified micro-organisms on the soil ecosystem | 9 |
| 20 | 135 |
About D.C. Naseby
D.C. Naseby is a scholar working on Pollution, Plant Science and Soil Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 735 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (9 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (8 papers) and Nematode management and characterization studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (148 citations), Plant Science (452 citations) and Pollution (84 citations). D.C. Naseby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Canada. Frequent co-authors include J. M. Lynch, José Antonio Pascual, Jim Lynch, Vipul Gohel, Ayten Karaca, Nigel J. Bainton, Daniel R. Beniac, Kathryn Bernard, Judith L. Isaac‐Renton and Lorraine McIntyre. Their work appears in journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Soil Biology and Biochemistry and Molecular Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.