Day Ne is a scholar working on Oncology, Epidemiology and Otorhinolaryngology.
According to data from OpenAlex, Day Ne has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Oncology, 5 papers in Epidemiology and 3 papers in Otorhinolaryngology. Recurrent topics in Day Ne's work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (3 papers) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). Day Ne is often cited by papers focused on Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (3 papers) and Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers). Day Ne collaborates with scholars based in France, Sweden and United States. Day Ne's co-authors include G de-Thé, Ho Jh, R Sohier, A. Geser, H Závadová, P. M. Tukei, M Mravunac, Robert H. Holland, F. Sturmans and Parkin Dm and has published in prestigious journals such as PubMed and Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich).
In The Last Decade
Day Ne
20 papers
receiving
1.7k citations
Hit Papers
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Day Ne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Day Ne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Day Ne more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Day Ne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Day Ne. The network helps show where Day Ne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Day Ne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Day Ne.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Day Ne based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Day Ne. Day Ne is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ne, Day, et al.. (2002). The role of correlated errors in the multivariate analysis of dietary data.. PubMed. 156. 21–2.1 indexed citations
2.
Zhang, Zuo‐Feng, et al.. (1989). Cervical screening attendance and its effectiveness in a rural population in China.. PubMed. 13(5-6). 337–42.14 indexed citations
Ne, Day, et al.. (1986). Epidemiological studies of anticancer drug carcinogenicity.. PubMed. 189–201.7 indexed citations
5.
Ne, Day. (1986). The epidemiological basis for evaluating different screening policies.. PubMed. 199–212.22 indexed citations
6.
Staneczek, W, et al.. (1986). A case-control study of leukaemia as a second primary malignancy following ovarian and breast neoplasms.. PubMed. 203–21.5 indexed citations
7.
Moss, S, et al.. (1986). Cervical cancer screening in north-east Scotland.. PubMed. 25–36.10 indexed citations
8.
Holland, Robert H., et al.. (1985). [Decrease in breast cancer mortality due to mass screening with mammography; results of the Nijmegen mass screening project 1975-1981].. PubMed. 129(10). 451–4.32 indexed citations
9.
Ne, Day, et al.. (1985). The latent period of Burkitt's lymphoma: the evidence from epidemiological clustering.. PubMed. 187–95.11 indexed citations
10.
Ne, Day. (1984). Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.. PubMed. 63(5). 714–8.64 indexed citations
11.
Ne, Day. (1984). Epidemiological data and multistage carcinogenesis.. PubMed. 339–57.10 indexed citations
12.
Ne, Day & J Wahrendorf. (1982). Possibilities for the reduction of breast cancer mortality.. PubMed. 41. 340–51.
13.
Shanmugaratnam, K., Ho Jh, U. Prasad, et al.. (1978). Nasopharyngeal carcinoma and histocompatibility antigens.. PubMed. 271–82.10 indexed citations
14.
Ne, Day, et al.. (1977). HLA and nasopharyngeal cancer.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 16. 145–8.2 indexed citations
15.
Jh, Ho, et al.. (1977). Immunogenetic aspects of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. V. Confirmation of a Chinese-related HLA profile (A2, Singapore 2) associated with an increased risk in Chinese for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.. PubMed. 47. 147–51.8 indexed citations
16.
Ne, Day. (1975). Some aspects of the epidemiology of esophageal cancer.. PubMed. 35(11 Pt. 2). 3304–7.63 indexed citations
17.
Shanmugaratnam, K., et al.. (1975). Immunogenetic aspects of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) III. HL-a type as a genetic marker of NPC predisposition to test the hypothesis that Epstein-Barr virus is an etiological factor in NPC.. PubMed. 249–58.19 indexed citations
18.
de-Thé, G, Day Ne, A. Geser, et al.. (1975). Sero-epidemiology of the Epstein-Barr virus: preliminary analysis of an international study - a review.. PubMed. 3–16.99 indexed citations
19.
Wassermann, M., et al.. (1974). Epidemiology of organochlorine insecticides in the adipose tissue of Israelis.. PubMed. 8(1). 1–7.9 indexed citations
20.
Wassermann, M., et al.. (1972). Storage of organochlorine insecticides in the adipose tissue of people in Kenya.. PubMed. 52(6). 509–14.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.