Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Daxton R. Stewart
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daxton R. Stewart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daxton R. Stewart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daxton R. Stewart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daxton R. Stewart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daxton R. Stewart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daxton R. Stewart. The network helps show where Daxton R. Stewart may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daxton R. Stewart
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daxton R. Stewart.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daxton R. Stewart based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daxton R. Stewart. Daxton R. Stewart is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Stewart, Daxton R., et al.. (2021). Freedom of Speech and Press in Muslim-Majority Countries. International journal of communication. 15. 25.2 indexed citations
Stewart, Daxton R., et al.. (2016). Up, Periscope. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 93(2). 312–331.13 indexed citations
10.
Stewart, Daxton R., et al.. (2015). 'Truthiness' and Second Level Agenda Setting: Satire News and Its Influence on Perceptions of Television News Credibility. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
11.
Stewart, Daxton R., et al.. (2015). Up, Periscope: Mobile Streaming Video Technologies, Privacy in Public, and the Right to Record. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
12.
Stewart, Daxton R.. (2014). Do Androids Dream of Electric Free Speech? Visions of the Future of Copyright, Privacy, and the First Amendment in Science Fiction. Communication Law and Policy.2 indexed citations
13.
Stewart, Daxton R.. (2012). Can I Use This Photo I Found on Facebook? Applying Copyright Law and Fair Use Analysis to Photographs on Social Networking Sites Republished for News Reporting Purposes. SSRN Electronic Journal. 10(1). 93–122.1 indexed citations
14.
Stewart, Daxton R.. (2012). Evaluating Public Access Ombuds Programs: An Analysis of the Experiences of Virginia, Iowa and Arizona in Creating and Implementing Ombuds Offices to Handle Disputes Arising under Open Government Laws. Journal of dispute resolution. 2012(2). 4.1 indexed citations
15.
Stewart, Daxton R.. (2011). Social Media Policies for Professional Communicators.1 indexed citations
16.
Stewart, Daxton R.. (2010). Harry Potter and the Exploitative Jackals: How Do J.K. Rowling's Books About the Boy Wizard Impact the Salience of Media Credibility Attributes in Young Audiences?. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Stewart, Daxton R., et al.. (2008). Evaluation Report on the Slovak Republic on Transparency of party funding (Theme II) : Third Evaluation Round, Adopted by GRECO at its 36th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 11-15 February 2008). Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University).7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.