David Wray

557 citations
9 papers · 128 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Classics top 10%
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

David Wray

7 papers receiving 70 citations

Peers

David Wray
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Anthropology 105
  • Classics 18
  • Philosophy 33
  • Archeology 27
  • Organic Chemistry 37
Replace Leofranc Holford‐Strevens with:
Leofranc Holford‐Strevens United Kingdom
Tony Woodman United Kingdom
Ingo Gildenhard United Kingdom
Vivienne Gray New Zealand
A. M. Bowie United Kingdom
Cedric Littlewood United States
Eckard Lefèvre Germany
S. J. Heyworth United Kingdom
Betty Rose Nagle United States
Barbara Weiden Boyd United States
David Wray relative to Leofranc Holford‐Strevens United Kingdom Leofranc Holford‐Strevens's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Leofranc Holford‐Strevens · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Wray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Wray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Wray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Wray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Wray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Wray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Wray. The network helps show where David Wray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside David Wray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Wray Line = papers co-authored together David Wray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 200174
2 200215
3 200312
4
Seneca and the Self
200911
5 20077
6
"Cool Rare Air": Zukofsky's Breathing with Catullus and Plautus
20044
7
Aprender a leer y escribir textos de información
20003
8
The Future of the Defined Contribution Revolution
19962
9 20020

About David Wray

David Wray is a scholar working on Anthropology, Organic Chemistry, Philosophy, Archeology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 9 papers that have together received 128 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (4 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (3 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers), E-Learning and Knowledge Management (1 paper), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper), Augustinian Studies and Theology (1 paper), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (1 paper) and Translation Studies and Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (105 citations), Classics (18 citations), Philosophy (33 citations), Archeology (27 citations) and Organic Chemistry (37 citations). David Wray has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Shadi Bartsch, Maureen Lewis, Richard S. Dunn and Sylvester J. Schieber. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Roman Studies, Classical Philology, Arethusa, Chicago Review and Cambridge University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact