David Wakarchuk

908 total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 798 citations indexed

About

David Wakarchuk is a scholar working on Ecology, Insect Science and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, David Wakarchuk has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 798 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Ecology, 15 papers in Insect Science and 4 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in David Wakarchuk's work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (15 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (13 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers). David Wakarchuk is often cited by papers focused on Forest Insect Ecology and Management (15 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (13 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers). David Wakarchuk collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. David Wakarchuk's co-authors include Robert L. Hamilton, T. C. Vrain, Brian T. Sullivan, Paul E. Kendra, Mark Deyrup, Wayne S. Montgomery, James L. Hanula, Jorge E. Macías-Sámano, Jocelyn G. Millar and E. Matthew Hansen and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain Research, Journal of Chemical Ecology and Journal of Economic Entomology.

In The Last Decade

David Wakarchuk

17 papers receiving 727 citations

Hit Papers

Intraspecific rDNA restriction fragment length polymorphi... 1992 2026 2003 2014 1992 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Wakarchuk United States 11 491 489 405 141 54 17 798
Ryusei Tanaka Japan 18 420 0.9× 264 0.5× 331 0.8× 153 1.1× 151 2.8× 43 819
Kai Metge Germany 10 746 1.5× 403 0.8× 415 1.0× 87 0.6× 129 2.4× 16 891
R. N. Inserra United States 19 1.1k 2.3× 347 0.7× 346 0.9× 43 0.3× 77 1.4× 126 1.2k
M. A. Bravo Portugal 10 755 1.5× 510 1.0× 483 1.2× 77 0.5× 131 2.4× 24 960
Ana Catarina Penas Portugal 9 722 1.5× 491 1.0× 462 1.1× 76 0.5× 130 2.4× 9 924
Ryoji Shinya Japan 13 480 1.0× 359 0.7× 120 0.3× 171 1.2× 71 1.3× 38 650
D. Sturhan Germany 18 1.5k 3.0× 707 1.4× 588 1.5× 283 2.0× 86 1.6× 121 1.6k
JEAN BIRD Australia 6 255 0.5× 170 0.3× 157 0.4× 93 0.7× 43 0.8× 8 552
Noritoshi Maehara Japan 17 554 1.1× 406 0.8× 347 0.9× 51 0.4× 91 1.7× 54 667
W. R. Nickle United States 15 662 1.3× 523 1.1× 287 0.7× 153 1.1× 131 2.4× 40 931

Countries citing papers authored by David Wakarchuk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Wakarchuk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Wakarchuk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Wakarchuk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Wakarchuk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Wakarchuk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Wakarchuk. The network helps show where David Wakarchuk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Wakarchuk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Wakarchuk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Wakarchuk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Wakarchuk. David Wakarchuk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
2.
Hansen, E. Matthew, et al.. (2019). Advances in Semiochemical Repellents to Mitigate Host Mortality From the Spruce Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology. 112(5). 2253–2261. 10 indexed citations
3.
Byers, John A., et al.. (2018). Inhibitory Effects of Semiochemicals on the Attraction of an Ambrosia Beetle Euwallacea nr. fornicatus to Quercivorol. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 44(6). 565–575. 20 indexed citations
4.
Vega, Fernando E., James M. Harnly, Francisco Infante, et al.. (2017). A Potential Repellent Against the Coffee Berry Borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Journal of Insect Science. 17(6). 20 indexed citations
5.
Hansen, E. Matthew, et al.. (2016). Lethal Trap Trees and Semiochemical Repellents as Area Host Protection Strategies for Spruce Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) in Utah. Journal of Economic Entomology. 109(5). 2137–2144. 12 indexed citations
6.
Kendra, Paul E., Wayne S. Montgomery, Mark Deyrup, & David Wakarchuk. (2015). Improved lure for redbay ambrosia beetle developed by enrichment of α-copaene content. Journal of Pest Science. 89(2). 427–438. 48 indexed citations
7.
Hanula, James L., Brian T. Sullivan, & David Wakarchuk. (2013). Variation in Manuka Oil Lure Efficacy for CapturingXyleborus glabratus(Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), and Cubeb Oil as an Alternative Attractant. Environmental Entomology. 42(2). 333–340. 31 indexed citations
8.
Macías-Sámano, Jorge E., David Wakarchuk, Jocelyn G. Millar, & Lawrence M. Hanks. (2012). 2-Undecyloxy-1-ethanol in combination with other semiochemicals attracts threeMonochamusspecies (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in British Columbia, Canada. The Canadian Entomologist. 144(6). 764–768. 34 indexed citations
10.
Sullivan, Brian T., Mark J. Dalusky, David Wakarchuk, & C. Wayne Berisford. (2007). Field Evaluations of Potential Aggregation Inhibitors for the Southern Pine Beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Entomological Science. 42(2). 139–149. 27 indexed citations
11.
Hansen, E. Matthew, et al.. (2006). Comparison of Naturally and Synthetically Baited Spruce Beetle Trapping Systems in the Central Rocky Mountains. Journal of Economic Entomology. 99(2). 373–382. 9 indexed citations
12.
Hansen, E. Matthew, et al.. (2006). Comparison of Naturally and Synthetically Baited Spruce Beetle Trapping Systems in the Central Rocky Mountains. Journal of Economic Entomology. 99(2). 373–382. 10 indexed citations
13.
Poland, Therese M., et al.. (2004). Semiochemical Disruption of the Pine Shoot Beetle, <I>Tomicus piniperda</I> (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environmental Entomology. 33(2). 221–226. 11 indexed citations
14.
Schmidt, Christian, Jens Roland, & David Wakarchuk. (2003). Evaluation of Synthetic Pheromones for Monitoring Forest Tent Caterpillar (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) Populations. Environmental Entomology. 32(1). 214–219. 9 indexed citations
15.
Poland, Therese M., Peter de Groot, David Wakarchuk, et al.. (2003). Development of an improved attractive lure for the pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Agricultural and Forest Entomology. 5(4). 293–300. 25 indexed citations
16.
Vanderwolf, C.H., Elaine Zibrowski, & David Wakarchuk. (2002). The ability of various chemicals to elicit olfactory β-waves in the pyriform cortex of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) and laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus). Brain Research. 924(2). 151–158. 7 indexed citations
17.
Vrain, T. C., et al.. (1992). Intraspecific rDNA restriction fragment length polymorphism in the Xiphinema americanum group.. Fundamental & applied nematology. 15(6). 563–573. 521 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026