David W. Mathes

3.1k total citations
126 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

David W. Mathes is a scholar working on Surgery, Transplantation and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, David W. Mathes has authored 126 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 88 papers in Surgery, 34 papers in Transplantation and 17 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in David W. Mathes's work include Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (54 papers), Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research (33 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (24 papers). David W. Mathes is often cited by papers focused on Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (54 papers), Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research (33 papers) and Breast Implant and Reconstruction (24 papers). David W. Mathes collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Türkiye. David W. Mathes's co-authors include Peter C. Neligan, Hakim K. Said, Daniel Liu, Otway Louie, Kari A. Keys, Mark A. Randolph, Michael R. Zenn, Lily Daniali, David H. Sachs and Daniel Z. Liu and has published in prestigious journals such as JAMA, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Blood.

In The Last Decade

David W. Mathes

115 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

David W. Mathes
Justin M. Sacks United States
Risal Djohan United States
Damon S. Cooney United States
Neil A. Fine United States
Gerhard S. Mundinger United States
Alexes Hazen United States
Thomas Satterwhite United States
Rami S. Kantar United States
Brian Rinker United States
Justin M. Sacks United States
David W. Mathes
Citations per year, relative to David W. Mathes David W. Mathes (= 1×) peers Justin M. Sacks

Countries citing papers authored by David W. Mathes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David W. Mathes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David W. Mathes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David W. Mathes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David W. Mathes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David W. Mathes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David W. Mathes. The network helps show where David W. Mathes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David W. Mathes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David W. Mathes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David W. Mathes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David W. Mathes. David W. Mathes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lee, Anna, et al.. (2025). Is the Future of Cleft Care Financially Sustainable? An Economic Analysis of Inflation-Adjusted Reimbursements. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 299909360–299909360.
2.
Winocour, Julian, et al.. (2025). Perioperative Vitamin D Insufficiency Impacts Postoperative Outcomes in Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 157(4). 605–611.
3.
Winocour, Julian, et al.. (2025). Abdominal Wall Reinforcement Using OviTex after Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. 42(1). 44–52. 1 indexed citations
4.
Winocour, Julian, et al.. (2024). Evaluation of the Impact of Physical Therapy on Patients With Macromastia Seeking Breast Reduction Surgery. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 44(12). NP862–NP869.
5.
Nazir, Niaman, et al.. (2024). The Effect of Numeric Versus Pass/Fail USMLE Step 1 Scores in the Integrated Plastic Surgery 2023-2024 Match Cycle: A Single Institution Study. Journal of surgical education. 81(11). 1667–1674. 3 indexed citations
6.
Beckett, Joel, et al.. (2024). A Systematic Review of the Complications Associated with Free Fibular Flaps in Adult and Pediatric Spinal Reconstruction. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. 41(6). 521–530. 1 indexed citations
7.
Malgor, Rafael D., et al.. (2024). The use of flaps for management of deep sternal wound complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 91. 302–311. 1 indexed citations
8.
Iorio, Matthew L., et al.. (2023). Macromastia and Reduction Mammaplasty: Analysis of Outpatient Cost of Care and Opioid Consumption at 5 Years Postoperatively. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 43(10). NP763–NP770. 1 indexed citations
9.
Cohen, Justin B., et al.. (2023). Analysis of Complications in Patients With a History of Cannabis Use and Tobacco Use Undergoing Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 44(1). NP41–NP48. 4 indexed citations
10.
Wang, Zhaohui, Huiping Zhang, David W. Mathes, et al.. (2023). CCR4‐IL2 bispecific immunotoxin is more effective than brentuximab for targeted therapy of cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma in a mouse CTCL model. FEBS Open Bio. 13(7). 1309–1319. 9 indexed citations
11.
Lee, Anna, Ryan Constantine, David W. Mathes, et al.. (2023). D41. Patterns of Postoperative Complications Related to Cannabis and Tobacco Usage in Patients Undergoing Facial Fracture Surgeries. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 11(4S). 82–82.
12.
Colakoğlu, Salih, Marc A.M. Mureau, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis, et al.. (2021). Telehealth: Could It Be an Avenue to Microvascular Breast Reconstruction for Patients with Geographical Barriers?. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. 37(7). 597–601. 5 indexed citations
13.
Colakoğlu, Salih, et al.. (2021). Clinical and preclinical tolerance protocols for vascularized composite allograft transplantation. Archives of Plastic Surgery. 48(6). 703–713. 12 indexed citations
14.
Colakoğlu, Salih, et al.. (2020). Changes to Venous Flow Coupler Signal during DIEP Flap Inset Can Be Predictive of Poor Clinical Outcomes in Autologous Breast Reconstruction. Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. 36(6). 466–470. 4 indexed citations
15.
Colakoğlu, Salih, et al.. (2020). Perioperative Blocks for Decreasing Postoperative Narcotics in Breast Reconstruction. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. 10(5). e105686–e105686. 15 indexed citations
16.
Liu, Daniel Z., et al.. (2012). Duration of Antibiotics after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Does Not Change Surgical Infection Rate. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 129(2). 362–367. 37 indexed citations
17.
Prucz, Roni B., et al.. (2011). Social Media in Plastic Surgery Practices: Emerging Trends in North America. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 31(4). 435–441. 103 indexed citations
18.
Mathes, David W. & Peter C. Neligan. (2010). Preoperative Imaging Techniques for Perforator Selection in Abdomen-Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction. Clinics in Plastic Surgery. 37(4). 581–591. 33 indexed citations
19.
Mathes, David W., et al.. (2009). A Survey of North American Burn and Plastic Surgeons on Their Current Attitudes Toward Facial Transplantation. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 208(6). 1051–1058e3. 18 indexed citations
20.
Wu, Anette, Kazuhiko Yamada, Christophe Baron, et al.. (2004). Detection of regulatory cells as an assay for allograft tolerance in miniature swine. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 23(2). 210–217. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026