Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within
it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression: A New Approach to Preventing Relapse
2002995 citationsDavid W. HodoAmerican Journal of Psychiatryprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of David W. Hodo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David W. Hodo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David W. Hodo more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David W. Hodo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David W. Hodo. The network helps show where David W. Hodo may publish in the future.
David W. Hodo is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Philosophy and Clinical Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (558 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (317 citations). Their work appears in journals such as JAMA and American Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.