David V. Powers

514 total citations
9 papers, 295 citations indexed

About

David V. Powers is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, David V. Powers has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 295 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in David V. Powers's work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers). David V. Powers is often cited by papers focused on Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers). David V. Powers collaborates with scholars based in United States. David V. Powers's co-authors include Dolores Gallagher‐Thompson, Keren Lehavot, Jeffrey E. Barnett, Robert J. Cramer, Angela L. Jefferson and Larry W. Thompson and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journals of Gerontology Series B, Aging & Mental Health and Professional Psychology Research and Practice.

In The Last Decade

David V. Powers

9 papers receiving 265 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David V. Powers United States 8 118 114 89 88 87 9 295
Khodamorad Momeni‎ Iran 9 155 1.3× 67 0.6× 39 0.4× 61 0.7× 40 0.5× 62 312
Jojanneke Korte Netherlands 9 135 1.1× 151 1.3× 41 0.5× 53 0.6× 51 0.6× 14 380
Mary Birken United Kingdom 9 150 1.3× 35 0.3× 35 0.4× 108 1.2× 91 1.0× 22 328
Torgeir Sørensen Norway 10 107 0.9× 56 0.5× 22 0.2× 46 0.5× 96 1.1× 31 254
Brian H. McCorkle United States 8 218 1.8× 77 0.7× 69 0.8× 121 1.4× 135 1.6× 9 407
Laurie Hare-Duke United Kingdom 10 165 1.4× 61 0.5× 41 0.5× 121 1.4× 60 0.7× 16 302
Ashley E. Ermer United States 10 83 0.7× 122 1.1× 26 0.3× 54 0.6× 184 2.1× 26 358
Kathryn Doyle United States 8 93 0.8× 100 0.9× 88 1.0× 62 0.7× 163 1.9× 11 370
Amy G. Weisman de Mamani United States 10 248 2.1× 125 1.1× 139 1.6× 50 0.6× 70 0.8× 16 412
Grazia Manzotti United Kingdom 5 128 1.1× 33 0.3× 20 0.2× 62 0.7× 87 1.0× 7 262

Countries citing papers authored by David V. Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David V. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David V. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David V. Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David V. Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David V. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David V. Powers. The network helps show where David V. Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David V. Powers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David V. Powers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David V. Powers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David V. Powers. David V. Powers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Lehavot, Keren, Jeffrey E. Barnett, & David V. Powers. (2010). Psychotherapy, professional relationships, and ethical considerations in the myspace generation.. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 41(2). 160–166. 58 indexed citations
2.
Powers, David V.. (2008). Psychotherapy in long-term care: II. Evidence-based psychological treatments and other outcome research.. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 39(3). 257–263. 7 indexed citations
3.
Powers, David V., Larry W. Thompson, & Dolores Gallagher‐Thompson. (2008). The Benefits of Using Psychotherapy Skills Following Treatment for Depression: An Examination of “Afterwork” and a Test of the Skills Hypothesis in Older Adults. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. 15(2). 194–202. 15 indexed citations
4.
Powers, David V.. (2008). Psychotherapy in long-term care: I. Practical considerations and the link to policy and advocacy.. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 39(3). 251–256. 3 indexed citations
5.
Powers, David V., et al.. (2007). Spirituality, Life Stress, and Affective Well-Being. Journal of Psychology and Theology. 35(3). 235–243. 46 indexed citations
6.
Powers, David V., et al.. (2002). Coping and Depression in Alzheimer's Caregivers: Longitudinal Evidence of Stability. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 57(3). P205–P211. 97 indexed citations
7.
Powers, David V., et al.. (2002). Spousal motivations of care for demented older adults. Journal of Aging Studies. 16(4). 383–399. 14 indexed citations
8.
Jefferson, Angela L., et al.. (2001). Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) in Older Women. Clinical Gerontologist. 22(3-4). 3–12. 23 indexed citations
9.
Gallagher‐Thompson, Dolores & David V. Powers. (1997). Primary stressors and depressive symptoms in caregivers of dementia patients. Aging & Mental Health. 1(3). 248–255. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026