David V. Powers
Impact in
- Health top 10%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Health disparities and outcomes
Papers in
-
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics 3
- Mental Health Treatment and Access 2
-
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving 4
- Co-authors
- Dolores Gallagher‐Thompson (3 shared papers)Jeffrey E. Barnett (1 shared paper)Keren Lehavot (1 shared paper)Robert J. Cramer (1 shared paper)Angela L. Jefferson (1 shared paper)Larry W. Thompson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Professional Psychology Research and Practice (3 papers)Clinical Gerontologist (1 paper)Journal of Aging Studies (1 paper)Aging & Mental Health (1 paper)Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David V. Powers
9 papers receiving 265 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 20
- Health 87
- Applied Psychology 49
- Psychiatry and Mental health 89
- Clinical Psychology 118
Countries citing papers authored by David V. Powers
This map shows the geographic impact of David V. Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David V. Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David V. Powers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David V. Powers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David V. Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David V. Powers. The network helps show where David V. Powers may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside David V. Powers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 97 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 58 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 46 | |
| 4 | 1997 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 3 |
About David V. Powers
David V. Powers is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (1 paper) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (20 citations), Health (87 citations), Applied Psychology (49 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (89 citations) and Clinical Psychology (118 citations). David V. Powers has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dolores Gallagher‐Thompson, Jeffrey E. Barnett, Keren Lehavot, Robert J. Cramer, Angela L. Jefferson and Larry W. Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Professional Psychology Research and Practice, Clinical Gerontologist, Journal of Aging Studies, Aging & Mental Health and Cognitive and Behavioral Practice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.