This map shows the geographic impact of David Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Schultz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Schultz. The network helps show where David Schultz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Schultz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Schultz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Schultz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Schultz. David Schultz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Schultz, David. (2014). THE IDEA OF THE “STATE” IN CONTEMPORARY PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION THEORY. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
4.
Schultz, David. (2014). Lights, Camera, Action! : Ethics and the California Recall. Public Integrity.1 indexed citations
5.
Schultz, David. (2010). The Neo-Liberal State in a Post-Global World. 3(7). 7–17.1 indexed citations
6.
Schultz, David. (2009). Administrative law and performance reform of government agencies in communist and post-communist states.1 indexed citations
7.
Schultz, David. (2009). Encyclopedia of the United States Constitution.1 indexed citations
8.
Schultz, David. (2008). Democracy on Trial: Terrorism, Crime, and National Security Policy in a Post 9-11 World. Golden Gate University law review. 38(2). 2.1 indexed citations
9.
Schultz, David. (2008). Lies, Damn Lies, and Voter IDs: The Fraud of Voter Fraud. 1.
10.
Schultz, David. (2008). Less Than Fundamental: The Myth of Voter Fraud and the Coming of the Second Great Disenfranchisement. William Mitchell law review. 34(2). 2.4 indexed citations
11.
Schultz, David. (2006). “What’s Yours Can be Mine: Are there Any Private Takings After City of New London v. Kelo?”. UCLA Journal of Environmental Law and Policy.
12.
Schultz, David. (2006). Minnesota Republican Party V. White and the Future of State Judicial Selection. Albany law review. 69(4). 985.3 indexed citations
Schultz, David. (2004). Lights, camera, campaign! : media, politics, and political advertising. P. Lang eBooks.17 indexed citations
15.
Schultz, David, et al.. (2000). A Matrix Approach to Software Process Definition. PORTO Publications Open Repository TOrino (Politecnico di Torino).
16.
Schultz, David. (2000). State Taxation of Interstate Commuters: Constitutional Doctrine in Search of Empirical Analysis. Touro law review. 16(2). 13.2 indexed citations
17.
Schultz, David. (2000). No Joy in Mudville Tonight: The Impact of Three Strike Laws on State and Federal Corrections Policy, Resources, and Crime Control. Cornell journal of law and public policy. 9(2). 557–584.9 indexed citations
18.
Garner, Bryan A. & David Schultz. (1999). A handbook of business law terms.1 indexed citations
19.
Schultz, David & Stephen E. Gottlieb. (1998). Legal Functionalism and Social Change: A Reassessment of Rosenberg's The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
20.
Schultz, David. (1991). THE LOCKE REPUBLICAN DEBATE AND THE PARADOX OF PROPERTY RIGHTS IN EARLY AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE. 13(2). 155.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.