David S. Bradford
- Surgery top 0.1%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.05%
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Co-authors
- JOHN H. MOERobert B. WinterSerena S. HuSigurd BervenJohn E. LonsteinVedat DevirenH A KingBobby Tay
- Topics
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (105 papers)Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (84 papers)Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (76 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
David S. Bradford
185 papers receiving 10.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
- Surgery 9.3k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 6.7k
- Pharmacology 1.5k
- Biomedical Engineering 911
- Genetics 407
Countries citing papers authored by David S. Bradford
This map shows the geographic impact of David S. Bradford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David S. Bradford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David S. Bradford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David S. Bradford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David S. Bradford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David S. Bradford. The network helps show where David S. Bradford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David S. Bradford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David S. Bradford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David S. Bradford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David S. Bradford. David S. Bradford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 136 | |
| 3 | 132 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 456 | |
| 6 | 226 | |
| 7 | 189 | |
| 8 | 75 | |
| 9 | 137 | |
| 10 | 77 | |
| 11 | 108 | |
| 12 | 90 | |
| 13 | 55 | |
| 14 | 57 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 49 | |
| 17 | The cause of neurologic deficit in acute spondylolisthesis listhetic crisis and in reduction of grades iii v spondylolisthesis | 1 |
| 18 | 96 | |
| 19 | 55 | |
| 20 | 55 |
About David S. Bradford
David S. Bradford is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacology, having authored 188 papers that have together received 11.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (105 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (84 papers) and Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (76 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (6.7k citations), Surgery (9.3k citations) and Pharmacology (1.5k citations). David S. Bradford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include JOHN H. MOE, Robert B. Winter, Serena S. Hu, Sigurd Berven, John E. Lonstein, Vedat Deviren, H A King, Bobby Tay, Ensor E. Transfeldt and James W. Ogilvie. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.